Intermodulation in an Amplifier and Third Order Incercept

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natalie Johnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplifier
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring intermodulation in amplifiers, specifically the discrepancies in the expected third-order intercept ratio of 3:1. Measurements from three amplifiers showed ratios of 3:1, 6:1, and 7:1, raising questions about the accuracy of the measurements or the amplifiers' performance. The harmonic performance is influenced by the amplifier's design and output devices, indicating that not all amplifiers will adhere to the theoretical ratio. The third-order intercept is deemed a useful metric for comparing amplifiers with mild non-linearity, but variations are expected across different models. Overall, assessing amplifier linearity through intermodulation products can provide valuable insights, though results may vary significantly.
Natalie Johnson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have measured a Transfer function curve for an amplifier, showing Input power vs output power. It shows non-linear increases for a portion of the transfer curve (at higher input power).

I also measured 3rd order intermodulation products during the input power range where it gives non linear output. I measured 3 Amplifiers.

On one Amplifier, the ratio of gradients was 3:1 (intermodulation power vs input power : output power vs input power) but the other two were not the theoretical 3:1 . They were 6:1 and 7:1. But from all three I obtained the correct Third Order Incercept as the manufacturers datasheet.

Why might amplifiers have intermodulation higher than the theoretical 3:1 ? If they cant, it must be an error with my measurements?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The harmonic performance will depend on the amplifier which depends on the output device and the circuit design. Third order intercept assessment is only useful for comparing amps with mild non linearity. What amp type are you measuring?
 
My measurements are based on a computer model. The computer model takes a waveform an amplifies it according to the manufacturers transfer curve of the amplifier. The amplified waveform is correct.

The intermodulation products are captured from a fast Fourier transform.

So basically, as long as I get the third order intercept correct - my model must be correctly obtaining the levels of intermodulation products. From what your saying, amplifiers in theory do not always have 3:1 ratio?
 
Natalie Johnson said:
From what your saying, amplifiers in theory do not always have 3:1 ratio?
Why should they? The third order intercept is a fair way to asses an amplifier where the transfer characteristic can be characterised with a simple polynomial. You can's assume that the result for all amplifiers will be the same.
Another way of assessing amplifier linearity is to measure intermodulation products from a two or three tone input signal. That can be very useful and repeatable for comparing amplifiers of different technologies.
It all depends.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top