Internal energy and thermal energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of internal energy and thermal energy as presented in a lecture. Participants explore the definitions and distinctions between ordered and random contributions to internal energy, particularly in the context of translational, vibrational, and rotational energies.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the lecturer's distinction between ordered and random contributions to internal energy.
  • One participant argues that translational energy should not be considered a form of internal energy, suggesting it refers to the motion of a body as a whole rather than the random motion of atoms.
  • Another participant proposes that translational energy could refer to the individual motions of gas molecules, as considered in kinetic theory.
  • A participant supports a description of internal energy that differentiates between coordinated and random kinetic energy, citing the average velocity of gas particles and deviations from it.
  • Some participants share links to external resources for further clarification on internal energy concepts.
  • One participant notes that they have not encountered the terminology used in the lecture before, indicating a potential lack of consensus on the definitions being discussed.
  • Another participant mentions that internal energy also includes potential energy associated with molecular interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions of ordered vs. random contributions to internal energy, with multiple competing views and interpretations presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for additional context from the lecture to fully understand the claims made about internal energy and its components. There are also references to differing interpretations of translational energy in relation to internal energy.

eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
I'm watching a lecture introduction internal energy and in it, the lecturer states the following for some system:

E_{internal} = E_{translational} + E_{vibrational} + E_{rotational} + E_{other}

where ## E_{other} ## could be chemical energy, magnetic energy, electrostatic energy etc.

Then he circles ## E_{translational} + E_{vibrational} + E_{rotational} ## and states that the RANDOM portions of these energy contributions represents the thermal energy. He says there is an ordered contribution from these terms and an unordered contribution and that this unordered (or random) contribution is the thermal energy.

What does the ordered vs. random contributions mean? I have no idea what that means.
 
Science news on Phys.org
eprparadox said:
What does the ordered vs. random contributions mean? I have no idea what that means.
Me neither! Can you post a link to the lecture?

eprparadox said:
E_{internal} = E_{translational} + E_{vibrational} + E_{rotational} + E_{other}
This doesn't bode well. Translational energy is definitely not a form of internal energy.
 
I think it's talking about the motion of a body as a whole, i.e. the coordinated motion of the atoms that make it up. For example, if you throw a ball, the translational motion of the ball is not internal energy - if you throw it faster it is not hotter - but the random motions of the atoms (superimposed on their ordered motion with the ball) do constitute internal energy - if the ball is hotter these random motions are more energetic.
 
DrClaude said:
Translational energy is definitely not a form of internal energy.
Is he not referring to the translational Energy of the individual molecule within the gas? After all, in elementary kinetic theory of gases, that is the only form of internal energy that's considered. The Rotational Energy that is also in the expression would normally be assumed the molecular rotation and not the coordinated rotation of the whole.
We would need to see the lecture to get the exact context of the expression. @mjc123 and I have both managed to get totally opposite messages from this; that speaks volumes. :smile:
 
I support mjc123's description of this very standard development. An example is an ideal monatomic gas. If ##\mathbf{v_i}## is the velocity of the i'th atom, then the average velocity of the gas is $$\bar{\mathbf v}=\frac{\sum_1^N{\mathbf{v_i}}}{N}$$If ##\mathbf{v'_i}## represents the deviations from the average velocity, then $$\mathbf{v_i}=\bar{\mathbf{v}}+\mathbf{v'_i}$$The total energy of the gas is the sum of the kinetic energies its particles: $$E=\sum_1^N\frac{m}{2}(\bar{\mathbf{v}}+\mathbf{v'_i})^2=N\frac{m}{2}\bar{v}^2+\frac{m}{2}\sum_1^Nv_i^2$$where the square on the left hand side of this equation symbolically represents the dot product of the vector velocity with itself. The first term on the right hand side of this equation is the "coordinated" kinetic energy of the gas, and the second term is the "random" kinetic energy, also called the internal energy of the gas. Thus,
$$E=(KE)+U$$U is typically calculated from the Boltzmann velocity distribution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost
Hey all!

Here is the lecture:

I set it to start at 1:25 but it's over the first few minutes that he discusses this.

In terms of the translational component to the internal energy, I think he is referring to the individual motions of the particles, as seen in the center of mass and as noted by @sophiecentaur.

I'll take a look at what you wrote @Chestermiller and respond soon!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
19K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K