Internal Resistance of a Car Battery

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 13K views
Reliquo
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An automobile battery has a terminal voltage of 12.8 V with no load. When the starting motor (which draws 90A) is running, the terminal voltage drops to 11.0 V. What is the internal resistance of the battery?

Homework Equations


V= EMF- Ir

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm just completely over thinking the problem and maybe missing something. In order to find EMF:

EMF= I(R+r) and in order to find this I need the R of the load in the circuit. This would be the Motor. The voltage drop is 1.8V so Ohm's Law would give V/I= (1.8)/(90A)=.02 Ohms, which seems way to low.

What am I missing here?
 
on Phys.org
Hi Reliquo,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your result looks okay. The no-load terminal voltage of the battery will be its EMF. The drop in terminal voltage due to a given current draw will be the drop across its internal resistance, so ΔV/I is the correct way to proceed, as you did.
 
gneill said:
Hi Reliquo,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your result looks okay. The no-load terminal voltage of the battery will be its EMF. The drop in terminal voltage due to a given current draw will be the drop across its internal resistance, so ΔV/I is the correct way to proceed, as you did.

So if the no-load terminal voltage of the battery is the EMF (12.8V) this would give:

V= EMF- Ir

11.0 V = 12.8 V - 90A(r)

-1.8 V= -90Ar
.02 = r (Internal resistance)

So is this correct then?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
Reliquo said:
So if the no-load terminal voltage of the battery is the EMF (12.8V) this would give:

V= EMF- Ir

11.0 V = 12.8 V - 90A(r)

-1.8 V= -90Ar
.02 = r (Internal resistance)

So is this correct then?
Yes.
 
haruspex said:
It looks a bit lower than typical in the real world, but hey, you have to work with the numbers you are given.
It actually looks very close to values I came up with about 10 years ago:

Code:
__measured__    calculated    notes
vdc    amps     R-internal
25.5     0       _n/a_       no load (and a guess)
22.6    96       0.030
22.5    92       0.033
22.2    97       0.034

22.4    95       0.032       average

I described the experiment briefly in at least three different threads. Here's one: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/boiling-water-w-a-car-battery.870832/#post-5468458

The 25.5 vdc no load value is guessed, as I didn't document the initial value.
The two batteries I had in series were also mismatched. One was a marine deep cycle, and the other was a typical car "starting" battery.

If we accept my spreadsheets linear interpolation:

2018.02.04.linear.interpolation.of.R.internal.png


0.02 Ω is just about spot on.

Perhaps you are using a newer fancy battery.
 

Attachments

  • 2018.02.04.linear.interpolation.of.R.internal.png
    2018.02.04.linear.interpolation.of.R.internal.png
    4 KB · Views: 5,887
You are correct. It seems low when a person at the electronics bench fiddling with milliamps all day imagines dumping 12 volts across a .1222 ohm load. The power supplies we use on a daily basis would fault out seeing .12ohms... but when you consider the electric motors efficiency, at perhaps 80%, you have .79kw being used as mechanical energy. Thats the equivalent of roughly 1 horsepower. Could a 1 horsepower pony motor crank your engine any better than that electric motor? Probably not. Its not a low resistance for the application, we are just not used to working with those current levels on a daily basis.