Internet Info: Is It a New Experience for Each User?

AI Thread Summary
Data related to internet usage, such as passwords, usernames, bookmarks, and browsing history, is typically stored locally on individual computers. When a different computer connects to the same internet connection, it does not have access to the previous user's data, provided the two computers are not directly networked or sharing information. However, exceptions exist, such as NAT, server-side caching, and potential ISP throttling, which may affect performance but not data visibility. If two computers are connected through a router, they share an IP address but do not inherently share browsing history or personal data unless specific sharing settings are enabled. Concerns about privacy arise if someone accesses the router's logs or if shared online accounts retain usage records, such as Google services. Overall, while casual users typically experience a distinct internet session, certain technical factors could lead to shared visibility of activity under specific conditions.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
All of the data one has relative to the Internet, such as passwords/usernames to sites, bookmarks, history, and all the so forth are stored on the computer, right? Therefore, if another user uses the same internet connection line (port, router, etc...) with another computer (his/her own computer), then the Internet to this user will be a new experience with no signs of previous activity, right?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct, unless the two computers communicate directly with each other in some fashion (this is not common).

- Warren
 
I see...many thanks for your fast reply.
 
chroot said:
Yes, that's correct, unless the two computers communicate directly with each other in some fashion (this is not common).

- Warren

For the most part yes, but I don't believe that's not entirely correct. Some exceptions would be NAT and server-side caching, not to mention reduced bandwidth due to both computers being active, or active throttling form your ISP due to traffic patterns they don't like.
 
Well, yes, junglebeast, but most casual users would not notice things like that. He was only concerned about browser state.

- Warren
 
junglebeast said:
For the most part yes, but I don't believe that's not entirely correct. Some exceptions would be NAT and server-side caching, not to mention reduced bandwidth due to both computers being active, or active throttling form your ISP due to traffic patterns they don't like.

I'm not too literate about this, but all this is if you're networked with the computer on a more direct level than the internet, right?
 
Gear300 said:
I'm not too literate about this, but all this is if you're networked with the computer on a more direct level than the internet, right?
Yes, the two computers would have to be networked together and allowed to access each other's information in order to share the information off of each other's computer.

For instance, when my daughter comes over and she connects her laptop to my ethernet cable and connects to my internet connection, she has zero access to any information on my computer. She cannot see where I've been, she has no access to my browsing history, nor my passwords, nothing.
 
Gear300 said:
I'm not too literate about this, but all this is if you're networked with the computer on a more direct level than the internet, right?

When you use 1 internet subscription to connect multiple computers to the internet, by definition these computers are networked on a more direct level than just "the internet." They are linked together by a router and have a shared IP address to the outside world, where they are viewed as 1 entity.

Yes, the two computers would have to be networked together and allowed to access each other's information in order to share the information off of each other's computer.

For instance, when my daughter comes over and she connects her laptop to my ethernet cable and connects to my internet connection, she has zero access to any information on my computer. She cannot see where I've been, she has no access to my browsing history, nor my passwords, nothing.

No Evo, the things I listed do not require you to enable any kind of sharing or "home network" setup...although it is true that you cannot just access your browsing history and stuff, this is not what Gear's question was in reply to.

Also, I should note that there are exploits now in the wild which can allow arbitrary websites to read your browsing history. This was on Slashdot a few weeks ago.

Back to the original question, I think you were being intentionally vague..and this has caused answers to be vague. If you are worried about someone else in your house discovering that you've been looking at porn, for example, this is not something you need to worry about unless they get into your computer. However, in regards to your more general question, "will the internet experience be completely unaffected with no signs of previous activity," the answer is not always yes.
 
junglebeast said:
If you are worried about someone else in your house discovering that you've been looking at porn, for example, this is not something you need to worry about unless they get into your computer.
Unless, that "someone else" knows how to view the logs on the router configuration page (not hard to do), or if, for some odd reason or another, you shared an online account from a service that would keep records of this; Google is the main one I'm thinking of, X-Marks would have that possibility, too.

That said, it is not guaranteed that they will be able to see your history by sharing one of the above accounts, but they might be able to, depending on the circumstances.
 
Back
Top