Interpreting microcanonical distribution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the microcanonical distribution for a particle influenced by a Coulomb potential. Participants explore the meaning of the delta function in the context of energy constraints within the microcanonical ensemble.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the delta function in the expression for the microcanonical distribution, specifically regarding its role in indicating constant energy surfaces in phase space.
  • Another participant explains that the delta function signifies that the probability distribution vanishes off the constant energy surface, implying that the system is constrained to this surface.
  • A question is raised about whether the original expression conveys information about the distribution itself or merely describes a property of the energy constraint.
  • A later reply suggests that the original expression is incomplete and proposes a more comprehensive form that includes the phase space volume, indicating uniform probability among accessible microstates at equilibrium.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the role of the delta function in defining the energy surface, but there is a lack of consensus regarding the completeness of the original expression and its implications for the distribution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the completeness of the expression and the implications of the phase space volume on the distribution.

jjr
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to interpret the expression of a microcanonical distribution for energy [itex]E_0[/itex] of a particle of mass m moving about a fixed centre to which it is attracted by a Coulomb potential, [itex]Zr^{-1}[/itex], where [itex]Z[/itex] is negative. The function expression looks like this:

[itex]ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = \delta(E_0 - \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2-Zr^{-1})[/itex].

Most of the stuff in the expression is understandable, but I am not sure what the delta signifies here. Any help?

Thanks!
J
 
Science news on Phys.org
In the microcanonical ensemble the system lies on a surface of constant energy in phase space so the probability distribution has to vanish off of the constant energy surface. The argument in the delta function just represents this surface.
 
So [itex]E_0 ≠ \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2+Zr^{-1} → ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = 0[/itex] ?

Does the original expression actually say something about the distribution itself, or only about this property?
 
jjr said:
So [itex]E_0 ≠ \frac{1}{2}m^{-1}p^2+Zr^{-1} → ρ_{E_0}(\textbf{r,p}) = 0[/itex] ?

Yes.

jjr said:
Does the original expression actually say something about the distribution itself, or only about this property?

Well what you originally wrote down is not complete. It should be ##\rho = \frac{\delta(E - E_0)}{\Omega_{E_0}}## where ##\Omega_{E_0}## is the phase space volume accessible to the microstates. This simply says that at equilibrium the probability of the system being found in any of the accessible microstates is the same for all microstates.
 
Great! Thanks for helping me out
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K