Interpreting the Sine Integral in Physics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Properly speaking, since [itex]sin(x)[/itex] and [itex]cos(x)[/itex] don't go to zero as [itex]x \rightarrow \infty[/itex], the following integrals are undefined:

[itex]\int_0^{\infty} cos(kx) dk[/itex]
[itex]\int_0^{\infty} sin(kx) dk[/itex]

However, in the handwavy way of physicists, we can often pretend that the cosine integral "converges" to [itex]\delta(x)[/itex], where [itex]\delta(x)[/itex] is defined via:

[itex]\int dx \delta(x) f(x) = f(0)[/itex]

This interpretation is sort-of justified because for nicely-behaved functions [itex]f[/itex], we can prove:

[itex]\int_{0}^{+\infty} dk (\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(x) cos(kx) dx) = f(0)[/itex]

If we blithely switch the order of integration, then we can write this as:

[itex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx f(x) (\int_{0}^{+\infty} cos(kx) dk) = f(0)[/itex]

which sort of justifies identifies the inner integral with [itex]\delta(x)[/itex].

My question is: Is there a related, equally hand-wavy interpretation of the sine integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevendaryl said:
However, in the handwavy way of physicists, we can often pretend that the cosine integral "converges" to δ(x)δ(x)\delta(x), where δ(x)δ(x)\delta(x) is defined via:

how you can say that? we know the function oscillates!
 
drvrm said:
how you can say that? we know the function oscillates!

That's why the word "converges" is in scare-quotes. The integral doesn't converge. However, for certain purposes, we can often act as if it converges to the delta function. (And for certain purposes, we can act as if the delta function is actually a function).
 
Last edited:
drvrm said:
how you can say that? we know the function oscillates!
That's typical answer of Mathematicians a century ago !
 
stevendaryl said:
My question is: Is there a related, equally hand-wavy interpretation of the sine integral?
By substituting ##\sin(kx)=\cos(kx-\pi/2)## into the integral of sine and then use the substitution technique to compute the integral as well as the hand-wavy definition of the cosine integral, I got an extremely unintuitive answer of ##\pi/(2x)##.