Intervals where the function is increasing

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = xln(x²) is increasing where its derivative f'(x) = 2 + ln(x²) is greater than zero. This leads to the inequality 2 + ln(x²) > 0, which simplifies to x² > e^(-2). Taking square roots results in the intervals (-∞, -1/e) and (1/e, ∞) for which the function is increasing. The use of the modulus in the logarithmic expression confirms that both positive and negative roots are valid, but only the positive root is necessary for determining the intervals of increase.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives and their implications on function behavior.
  • Familiarity with logarithmic properties, particularly ln(x²) = 2ln|x|.
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their solutions in real numbers.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills, including solving square root equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions, focusing on their derivatives and behavior.
  • Learn about critical points and how they relate to increasing and decreasing intervals of functions.
  • Explore the concept of absolute values in inequalities and their impact on solution sets.
  • Practice solving similar problems involving derivatives and intervals of increase for various functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and function analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of increasing functions and their intervals.

t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the function f(x)=xln(x²), x≠0


The Attempt at a Solution



f'(x)=2+ln(x²)

For the function to be increasing f'(x)>0

2+ln(x²)>0
ln(x²)>-2
x²>e^(-2)

Taking square roots of both sides

±x>±(1/e)

How can I find the intervals from this?
(Somebody has suggested to me that after taking the square root of 1/e the answer should be positive only rather than plus/minus, but I can't seem to find a reason why such would be the case)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
note that if you accept that [tex]\log (x^2) = 2 \log (x)[/tex], then now RHS implies that x should be non-negative. That's the only possible reason I can think of that may dictate that you take the +ve root. But, it is clear that for your f(x) both +/- roots are good solutions and your interval is
[tex](-\infty,-1/e) \cup (1/e, \infty)[/tex]
 
mjsd said:
note that if you accept that [tex]\log (x^2) = 2 \log (x)[/tex], then now RHS implies that x should be non-negative. That's the only possible reason I can think of that may dictate that you take the +ve root. But, it is clear that for your f(x) both +/- roots are good solutions and your interval is
[tex](-\infty,-1/e) \cup (1/e, \infty)[/tex]

yeah I got it!
If I bring the two down to the front of the natural logarithm I will get
2ln|x|.

With the modulus then I get |x|>(1/e) and hence the intervals (-∞, -1/e) and (1/e, ∞)

Thanks! :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K