Intervention of Math in Biology

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aadharsh Aadhithya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of mathematics into biology, exploring the potential for mathematical equations to encapsulate the complexities of biological organisms. Participants consider the challenges of modeling biological systems and the applicability of mathematical approaches in understanding life sciences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses fascination with the role of mathematics in physics and chemistry, questioning how it can be applied to biology to create comprehensive equations for organisms.
  • Another participant argues that real-life systems, including biological ones, are too complex for simple mathematical predictions, emphasizing the need for models and numerical simulations.
  • A reference to the concept of "42" from Douglas Adams' work is made, suggesting that mathematical equations could define organisms and their uniqueness, citing Max Tegmark's ideas.
  • Some participants mention ongoing efforts in computational modeling of simple organisms, indicating that while challenging, there are attempts to apply mathematical modeling in biology.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of fully understanding complex systems, such as the universe, if even the behavior of a vast number of atoms in an organism is difficult to predict.
  • One participant highlights the existence of interdisciplinary fields like biomathematics and biophysics, noting that mathematics is already being creatively applied in biology.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of finding suitable models for specific problems rather than attempting to track every individual atom in a system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of reducing biological systems to mathematical equations. While some acknowledge the complexity and limitations of such approaches, others point to existing interdisciplinary fields and ongoing research efforts, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of biological systems and the limitations of current mathematical models, suggesting that assumptions about predictability and simplification are critical to the discussion.

Aadharsh Aadhithya
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
We all know those kinematic equations...! It is pretty much amazing that how knowing about a particle's velocity and acceleration at a given point of time governs its velocity at any other point of time... It is much cooler when you think deeper... How just mathematics is the language of physics. It is(maths) is even significantly used in chemistry...But in bio?

Can someone suggest ways to install math in bio or bio in math in such a way that just an equation would tell you about everything about an organism...??
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Aadharsh Aadhithya said:
Can someone suggest ways to install math in bio or bio in math in such a way that just an equation would tell you about everything about an organism...??
That doesn't even work in physics beyond the easiest homework problems. Real-life systems are usually way too complex to predict them with easy formulas. You need approximations, some models to simplify the systems, numerical simulations, ...
Biological systems are extremely complex. Every atom in them follows the laws of physics, but there is no way to calculate the behavior of 100000000000000000000 individual atoms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pythagorean
The number 42 is, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, the "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything", calculated by an enormous supercomputer named Deep Thought over a period of 7.5 million years.
To compare that result with current thinking and progress, check out some of Max Tegmark's work. The last I heard, he would suggest that it might be a series of math/physics equations to define a organism, even to distinguish our individual uniqueness.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aadharsh Aadhithya
mfb said:
That doesn't even work in physics beyond the easiest homework problems. Real-life systems are usually way too complex to predict them with easy formulas. You need approximations, some models to simplify the systems, numerical simulations, ...
Biological systems are extremely complex. Every atom in them follows the laws of physics, but there is no way to calculate the behavior of 100000000000000000000 individual atoms.
Thanks @mfb... But if u think understanding an organism fully is impossible, that is just 10^20 atoms, then how will science understand the whole universe, which we don't even know to define? You being a particle physicist, I am looking forward for your reply.
 
Aadharsh Aadhithya said:
then how will science understand the whole universe, which we don't even know to define?
You don't have to track every atom of the moon to understand that it orbits the Earth. And you don't have to know the position of every moon to understand the evolution of galaxies.

Find models suitable to the problem you have.

PS: Multiple exclamation or question marks in a row look silly.
 
  • #10
Indeed, a typical adult consists of about 4e28 atoms.
Yet we found a way to understand each other. :-)
 
  • #11
Of course, mathematics are extensively used in biology... Not only that, but numerous interdisciplinary fields have existed for a while now and many continue to develop. Just a few: biomathematics, bioengineering, biophysics, and biostatistics. Every so often I come across awesome examples of new uses of mathematics in biology, it's a very creative tool.

Read this, it will give you an idea of how difficult it would be to reduce humans into an equation: An estimation of the number of cells in the human body

I know all this is exciting stuff, but some advice that may help you socially: An easy rule to remember about exclamation points and ellipses is that they both should (usually) only occur in a single or triple mark (!/! or ./.../. . . ); while, using 2 of either may come across to the reader as a punctuation error, and more than 3 is distracting. To express more than one question mark, either ...? /?!/!? can work. Some people do view communicating with proper grammar and punctuation as being polite. Others will take you more seriously if they see real effort was placed into expressing yourself. I make errors all the time, but it’s more important to me that others can see that I tried. It's especially polite to make the effort when you are asking others to put in the effort to communicate as well. It shows that you care about yourself and others. One of my pet peeves is the abbreviation of words like "you" into "u"- it tells me that the writer doesn't think much of the person if they cannot make the effort to type two more letters. I couldn't even do that in a text message!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K