Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Intraplate Earthquakes and Seismicity

  1. Aug 31, 2015 #1

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    http://news.yahoo.com/earths-moving-mantle-leads-earthquakes-unusual-places-100843422.html
    Yellowstone is a relatively hot area.
    http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/observatories/yvo/
    http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/monitoring_tomography.html

    Then there is the New Madrid fault zone in the middle of the US.
    http://dnr.mo.gov/geology/geosrv/geores/techbulletin1.htm
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 31, 2015 #2

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

  4. Sep 1, 2015 #3

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The NMFZ is an interesting case of intraplate seismic activity compared to say intraplate activity within the Australian continent.

    Being that the NMFZ was a rifting plate boundary in the making that failed to continue. A changing tectonic regime within the North American Plate, as a whole, saw the NMFZ change from rifting tectonics to a thrust and strike-slip faulting system.

    The Indo-Australian Plate and in particular, the Australian Continent doesn't show any similar significant regions of rifting or thrusting in its geological history, yet has produced a number of significant ( M6 to ~ M 7.2) events over the last ~ 100 years

    I will have to do some researching into studies on mantle plumes under the Australian Continent to see if there is any correlation between sites of large and or regular events and plumes ( surely someone has done some seismic tomography research ) :smile:
    There are several active regions in Australia of regular small events

    Honestly ... is that really a eureka moment ? ... I would have thought that would have been more of a foregone conclusion ... particularly in places like "the geysers" area on the CA-NV border, Mammoth Lakes, CA or Yellowstone regions. What do they expect to be the results of rising mantle plumes pushing against the underside of the crust ?



    http://www.geo.arizona.edu/geo5xx/geos577/projects/muhlenkamp/tectonics.htm


    cheers
    Dave
     
  5. Sep 1, 2015 #4

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    There may have been more definitive observations of convection hidden in references from the link --- I haven't chased any down.
    Does a failed rift count as a plate boundary? "Chickens:eggs::half dozen:six?" Or, is a semantic distinction of no real significance being made between intra- and inter-plate activity?
     
  6. Sep 2, 2015 #5

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    no I don't think it does.
    What I was trying to get across was that there is a significant reason for the events in the NMFZ and seismically active geothermal hotspots
    compared to the intraplate seismically active regions as in Australia ( and probably other parts of the world (that I haven't studied)).
    And that is something I consider relevant when looking for other causes of seismicity well away from the plate edges

    EDIT: ..... Apart from any deformation of the crust via mantle plumes, the other significant
    contributor of intra-plate events would be the natural releasing and reorganising of stresses as a whole across a given plate during its migration.


    Dave
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2015
  7. Sep 2, 2015 #6

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    From Wiki, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crater_of_Diamonds_State_Park , "(snip)Arkansas (snip)
    (snip)Crater of Diamonds volcanic pipe is part of a 95-million-year-old eroded volcano. The deeply sourced lamproite magma, from the upper mantle, brought the diamonds to the surface. The diamonds had crystallized in the cratonic root of the continent long before and were sampled by the magma as it rose to the surface. The geology of the area and the diamond formation process itself were the subjects of the Ph.D. dissertation of Roland Everett Langford in 1973 from the University of Georgia; in it, he proposed a gas phase reaction from the reduction of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in the upper mantle. The dissertation was on display at the state park for many years. The lamproite diamond source is unusual, as almost all diamonds are mined from kimberlite and from alluvial deposits of diamonds weathered from kimberlite. The most prominent lamproite diamond source is the Argyle diamond mine in Australia."
    Might be a pointer (no, not the shark) for you.
     
  8. Sep 2, 2015 #7

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    speaking of sharks .... a 6 and a bit metre great white was videoed offshore northern NSW state today 18+ freakin' feet !! very scary

    yes, I am aware of the Kimberlite type diamond deposits in Oz. But of course they are reasonably old formations ... stated above 95 million yrs etc

    keeping on the original thread topic ... am more interested in younger activity to ongoing current activity

    another interesting article ....
    Mantle plumes crack continents
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140904103807.htm
    was also posted in physics.org
    http://phys.org/news/2014-09-mantle-plumes-continents.html

    a couple of snippets from another site ....

    this may be interesting.....
    http://austhrutime.com/superplumes_mantle_plumes_subducting_slabs_multiscale_seismic_tomography.htm


    there's more stuff out there, will have to do more searching and reading :smile:

    cheers
    Dave
     
  9. Sep 2, 2015 #8

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    "In the model, the deformations are created quickly from a geological point of view. Rift systems several kilometres deep and more than a thousand kilometres long can form after "just" two million years." (from Davenn's link http://phys.org/news/2014-09-mantle-plumes-continents.html#jCp )

    This has me "drooling" over possibilities for hunting "fossil" rifts
     
  10. Sep 2, 2015 #9

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    That made me giggle :smile: ( in a good way)

    mite make for a good MSc or PhD study topic

    "The implications of reactivated fossil rifts due to mantle plumes" :wink:


    Dave
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Intraplate Earthquakes and Seismicity
  1. An earthquake (Replies: 4)

  2. Earthquake prediction (Replies: 27)

  3. NZ Earthquakes (Replies: 32)

  4. Seismic scattering (Replies: 4)

Loading...