Intuitive understanding of convolution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter filter54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution
filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I had a terrible adjunct professor in ODEs and got little or no theory. I'm not in PDEs and my much better professor just (re)introduced convolutions while generalizing the heat equation to Rn - unfortunately it was not a reintroduction for me.

Later chapters in the book deal with transforms, which are, I think "special" convolutions where you mix the subject function with a specific kernel function. Apparently I need to understand this concept.

Any resources for getting an intuitive understanding of what a convolution *is* and why one would want to do such a thing? I played around on Youtube and Wikipedia and I see the mechanics but not the theory.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Convolution was first derived somewhere along the progress of when mathematicians were trying to solve the problems associated with Fourier transform.

It would be best if you could find a book on Fourier Transform. You could also find the explanation on Stanford's Youtube channel but I think you would need to start from lecture 1 to understand it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top