Inverse Funcation of Relativistic mass

Uncle6
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The relativistic mass equation shows the relationship between relativistic mass and speed. Basically showing that the closer u get to light speed the less relativistic mass you have, but ur rest mass will be the same.

I was asked by my friend what the inverse of that formula means.

Thus I took the original equation and came up with the inverse: m = sqrt(c^2-(m0c^2/v)^2)

I also looked at the graph of the original and the inverse would just be a reflection about y=x.

I still can't interpret it. Any hints/ help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uncle6 said:
The relativistic mass equation shows the relationship between relativistic mass and speed.

Do you mean

m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2}}

Basically showing that the closer u get to light speed the less relativistic mass you have, but ur rest mass will be the same.

Don't you mean "more relativistic mass" (not "less")?

Thus I took the original equation and came up with the inverse: m = sqrt(c^2-(m0c^2/v)^2)

You must have made a mistake in your algebra somewhere. The units of the various quantities don't work out consistently in that equation. Also, if you started with the equation I gave above, an "inverse" equation would not start with "m =" but with "v =".
 
I switched m for v and isolated for m
 
We were supposed to guess that the relativistic mass in your equation was actually a velocity!? :confused: It's always a bad idea to change the meaning of the symbols without telling anyone.

If you solve the equation in jtbell's post for v, you get

v=c\sqrt{1-\frac{m_0^2}{m^2}}=c\sqrt{1-\frac{m_0^2c^4}{E^2}}

where E=mc2 is the energy. Note that v→c when E→∞.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top