Inverse Funcation of Relativistic mass

Uncle6
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The relativistic mass equation shows the relationship between relativistic mass and speed. Basically showing that the closer u get to light speed the less relativistic mass you have, but ur rest mass will be the same.

I was asked by my friend what the inverse of that formula means.

Thus I took the original equation and came up with the inverse: m = sqrt(c^2-(m0c^2/v)^2)

I also looked at the graph of the original and the inverse would just be a reflection about y=x.

I still can't interpret it. Any hints/ help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uncle6 said:
The relativistic mass equation shows the relationship between relativistic mass and speed.

Do you mean

m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2}}

Basically showing that the closer u get to light speed the less relativistic mass you have, but ur rest mass will be the same.

Don't you mean "more relativistic mass" (not "less")?

Thus I took the original equation and came up with the inverse: m = sqrt(c^2-(m0c^2/v)^2)

You must have made a mistake in your algebra somewhere. The units of the various quantities don't work out consistently in that equation. Also, if you started with the equation I gave above, an "inverse" equation would not start with "m =" but with "v =".
 
I switched m for v and isolated for m
 
We were supposed to guess that the relativistic mass in your equation was actually a velocity!? :confused: It's always a bad idea to change the meaning of the symbols without telling anyone.

If you solve the equation in jtbell's post for v, you get

v=c\sqrt{1-\frac{m_0^2}{m^2}}=c\sqrt{1-\frac{m_0^2c^4}{E^2}}

where E=mc2 is the energy. Note that v→c when E→∞.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top