Inverse of diagonal dominant matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffrey159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrices
geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
72

Homework Statement


Show that ##n\times n ## complex matrices such that ##\forall 1\le i \le n,\quad \sum_{k\neq i} |a_{ik}| < |a_{ii}|##, are invertible

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



If I show that the column vectors are linearly independent, then the matrix has rank ##n## and is invertible.

Let ##\lambda_1, ..., \lambda_n## be complex coefficients such that ##\sum_{k = 1}^n \lambda_k a_{ik} = 0## for all ##1 \le i \le n##. There must be ##\lambda_i## such that ## |\lambda_j| \le |\lambda_i| ## for all ##j\neq i##. If ##\lambda_i \neq 0##, then ## |a_{ii} | = \frac{1}{|\lambda_i|} | \sum_{k\neq i} \lambda_k a_{ik} | \le \frac{|\lambda_i|}{|\lambda_i|} \sum_{k\neq i} |a_{ik}| < |a_{ii}|##
This is absurd so ##\lambda_i = 0## and all the other lambda's are zero because ##\lambda_i## dominates in module all the other lambda's. So the column vectors are linearly independant.

Is it Ok ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your proof is concise and to the point - nothing to add.
 
  • Like
Likes geoffrey159
Thank you
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top