Inverse trigonometry - Finding solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation 2arccos(x) = arccot((2x^2-1)/(2x√(1-x^2))). The initial conclusion suggests that the solution set is (0,1), but further analysis indicates that the correct domain is (-1,1)-{0}. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the principal ranges of the functions involved, as discrepancies can lead to incorrect solutions. Specifically, issues arise when x is negative or zero, as the left-hand side cannot yield negative values. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of considering the overlap of principal ranges when determining valid solutions.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


Which of the following is the solution set of the equation
$$2\arccos(x)=\text{arccot}\left(\frac{2x^2-1}{2x\sqrt{1-x^2}}\right)$$
A)(0,1)
B)(-1,1)-{0}
C)(-1,0)
D)[-1,1]

Ans: A

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I start by rewriting LHS in terms of ##\arctan##.
$$2\arccos(x)=2\arctan\left(\frac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}\right)$$
Using ##2\arctan(y)=\arctan\left(\frac{2y}{1-y^2}\right)##, it can be further simplified to
$$\arctan\left(\frac{2x\sqrt{1-x^2}}{2x^2-1}\right)=\text{arccot}\left(\frac{2x^2-1}{2x\sqrt{1-x^2}}\right)$$.
Hence, both LHS and RHS are identical. It can be concluded that they satisfy all values of x in their domain. The domain is (-1,1)-{0} i.e answer is B. But the given answer is A.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Through such manipulations, there's always a risk of introducing extra solutions. Since all offered answers include continuous ranges, it was almost inevitable that simplification would lead to tautology. There are values where the original equation makes no sense. Clearly x = 0 and x >= 1 are problematic. Also bear in mind that arccos(x) is a defined function that only takes one of the y values that satisfy x = cos(y), likewise arccot.
 
haruspex said:
Through such manipulations, there's always a risk of introducing extra solutions. Since all offered answers include continuous ranges, it was almost inevitable that simplification would lead to tautology. There are values where the original equation makes no sense. Clearly x = 0 and x >= 1 are problematic. Also bear in mind that arccos(x) is a defined function that only takes one of the y values that satisfy x = cos(y), likewise arccot.

I still don't see how to eliminate the extra solutions. :confused:
 
Hi Pranav-Arora! :smile:

arctan is defined to be in (-π/2,π/2)

arccos (and arcsin) is defined to be in [0,π)

where they don't agree, you get an error "translating" from one to the other
Pranav-Arora said:
$$2\arccos(x)=2\arctan\left(\frac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}\right)$$

eg that isn't true for x = -1/√2 …

the LHS is 2*3π/4, but the RHS is 2*-π/4 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
eg that isn't true for x = -1/√2 …

the LHS is 2*3π/4, but the RHS is 2*-π/4 :wink:


I see that for the above to be possible, x must be greater than 0. This does give the right answer but how am I supposed to think this way. I mean I always face the problem of this "principal range" and end up with the wrong answer. In this case, can you please explain how should I have approached the problem? Thank you!
 
Hi Pranav-Arora! :smile:
Pranav-Arora said:
… how am I supposed to think this way. I mean I always face the problem of this "principal range" and end up with the wrong answer. In this case, can you please explain how should I have approached the problem?

When the principal ranges differ, the solution has to be in the overlap.

If it isn't, it can't be a solution …

eg in this case, if x < 0, the the RHS is obviously negative, but the LHS can never be negative! :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Pranav-Arora! :smile:When the principal ranges differ, the solution has to be in the overlap.

If it isn't, it can't be a solution …

eg in this case, if x < 0, the the RHS is obviously negative, but the LHS can never be negative! :wink:

Thanks tiny-tim! :smile:

I have one more problem similar to this. Instead of creating a new thread, I will post it here as I think its related to this "principal range" problem.

Here goes the question:
Solution set of the equation, ##\arccos(x)-\arcsin(x)=\arccos(\sqrt{3}x)##
A)is a unit set
B)consists of two elements
C)B)consists of three elements
D)is a void set

The equation is defined when ##-1/\sqrt{3}\leq x \leq 1/\sqrt{3}##. I can rewrite ##\arcsin(x)## as ##\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})##. I guess here I have to apply the condition that ##x>0## for this to be true. Correct?

Now using ##\arccos(a)-\arccos(b)=\arccos(ab+\sqrt{(1-a^2)(1-b^2)})##
$$\arccos(x\sqrt{1-x^2}+|x|\sqrt{1-x^2})=\arccos(\sqrt{3}x)$$
Since x>0, |x|=x. Solving further gives x=0 and 1/2 which suggests that answer is B and this is incorrect. Where did I go wrong this time? :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I can rewrite ##\arcsin(x)## as ##\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})##.

No, if x < 0, then arcsin < 0 but ##\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})## > 0 :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
tiny-tim said:
No, if x < 0, then arcsin < 0 but ##\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})## > 0 :wink:

Do I write ##\arcsin(x)=-\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})## for ##x<0##?
 
  • #10
Pranav-Arora said:
Do I write ##\arcsin(x)=-\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})## for ##x<0##?

yes, that seems to work :smile:

oh, and you can combine the two into

##\arcsin(x)=sign(x)\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})##​
 
  • #11
tiny-tim said:
yes, that seems to work :smile:

oh, and you can combine the two into

##\arcsin(x)=sign(x)\arccos(\sqrt{1-x^2})##​

Great, thanks a lot tiny-tim! :smile:
 
Back
Top