Investigating Beta Particle Backscatter from Foil Materials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on designing an experiment to investigate beta particle backscatter from various foil materials, specifically aluminum and tin, while varying the foil thickness. The recommended beta particle sources include Potassium-40 (K-40) and Strontium-90 (Sr-90), both of which are accessible through academic departments specializing in Nuclear Engineering or Health Physics. The experiment should ideally be conducted in a vacuum to minimize angle distribution and ensure accurate measurements, with a Geiger-Müller (GM) tube positioned outside the vacuum for detection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta particle emission and detection
  • Familiarity with Geiger-Müller (GM) tube operation
  • Knowledge of radionuclides, specifically Strontium-90 and Potassium-40
  • Basic principles of experimental design in nuclear physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and safety protocols for handling Strontium-90
  • Learn about the vacuum setup for radiation experiments
  • Investigate the effects of foil thickness on beta particle scattering
  • Explore the use of Geiger-Müller tubes in radiation detection
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in nuclear physics, experimental physicists, and students in Nuclear Engineering or Health Physics looking to design experiments involving beta particle interactions and safety considerations.

exequor
Messages
393
Reaction score
0
I am designing an experiment to investigate how the number of beta particles scattered backwards depends on the thickness of a foil and the proton number of the foil material. I have an idea of what I will do, i.e. I will have the beta particles fired at the foil and place a GM tube next to the source the get the number of particles scattered backwards. i will change the thickness of the foil, and would also change the type of foil (aluminum, tin and some other material).

What source can i use for emitting the beta particles?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Salt substitute is made of Potassium Chloride. 0.00118% of the K is a beta emitter at 1.3 and 1.5MeV. Otherwise, you will have to go with a commercially produced beta emitter.
 
Where will you be doing this experiment? Most academic departments (Nuclear Engineering or Health Physics) should have a supply of common radionuclides.

You might want to use something like Sr-90, half-life of 29 years, no gamma., and maximum beta energy of 0.546 MeV. It is a pretty common radionuclide.

I would recommend if at all possible, putting the beta source and scattering surface in a vacuum, with the GM just outside. If you do this, be careful that you don't blow out the window of the detector (if thin window, that is).

Otherwise put the scattering foil, source and detector close together. The problem with the latter setup is that you will get a broader distribution of angles.

As Cyclotron Boy inidcated, K-40 is also good because of the long half-life and high max. beta energy.
 
Where will you be doing this experiment? Most academic departments (Nuclear Engineering or Health Physics) should have a supply of common radionuclides.
I won't be carrying out the actual experiment, instead I am just designing one. The extra information is helpful because I have to look at safety and precautions too.

I would recommend if at all possible, putting the beta source and scattering surface in a vacuum, with the GM just outside. If you do this, be careful that you don't blow out the window of the detector (if thin window, that is).
What would happen if the detector is inside the vacuum? Would it do more damage to the detector as opposed to the detector being outside the vacuum?

Otherwise, you will have to go with a commercially produced beta emitter.
Would this include the Sr-90 that Astronuc talked about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K