Investigating environmental time series and algorithms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing environmental time series to identify unexpected events using Gaussian probability density functions (pdf) based on historical data. The user is exploring the integration of spectral analysis, specifically through Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), to compute periodicities in new data. A challenge arises in determining how to utilize these periodic frequencies to update the pdf and define thresholds for unexpected readings. Advice is provided on normalizing data to account for seasonal effects, suggesting the use of seasonal components for more accurate analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adapting statistical methods to improve anomaly detection in time series data.
wess80
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am currently investigating environmental time series and algorithms to determine when an 'unexpected' event/reading has occurred in the series. I am currently constructing the gaussian probability density function (pdf) based on historical readings and checking if 'new' readings are acceptable according to a threshold in the pdf. As time goes by the pdf threshold becomes too large. Also, my time series contains daily and seasonal components.

I have received advice to use spectral analysis (using an FFT) on new month's data to compute the new month's periodicities. I have done so and now am faced with the question of how and what to do with the periodic frequencies in order to help determine what/when an unexpected reading is (according to the distribution).

I was thinking that perhaps it is possible to update a time series' pdf according to it's Fourier transform?

Could some one guide on this.

Thanks,

Wess
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can only tell what economists usually do. They clean the data from seasonal effects, i.e. they norm the data. If you know the seasonal (monthly) effects, you can divide the data by the norm of those effects. However, if e.g. the seasonal effects are of the form ##A+B(t)## and current data are ##C(t)##, i.e. a constant socket ##A## and fluctuations ##B(t)## on top, then you will only use ##B(t)## for normalization: ##C_0(t):= A+ \dfrac{C(t)-A}{B(t)}.##
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top