Calculating Investment Growth: $5,000 to $7,500 at 8% Interest

  • Thread starter Thread starter m90210
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Investing
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for $5,000 to grow to $7,500 at 8% interest, both compounded semiannually and continuously, the relevant formulas are A=P(1+r/m)^(mt) for compound interest and A=Pe^(rt) for continuous compounding. The discussion highlights the importance of showing calculations and results to receive accurate assistance. Without specific details on the calculations attempted or the textbook's answer, it's challenging for others to provide help. Clarifying these points would enable more effective guidance on achieving the correct answer. Accurate application of the formulas is essential for resolving the investment growth question.
m90210
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How many years (to two decimal places) will it take $5,000 to grow to $7,500 if invested at 8% compounded semiannually? Compounded continuously? Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Plug into&chug out of the formula given in your textbook.
 
simple interest; A=P(1+rt)
compound interest; A=P(1+r/m)^mt
continuous compound interest; A=Pe^rt

I just can't seem to get my answer to match what is in the textbook. :(
 
You haven't shown us what you did, you haven't told us what answer you got, you haven't told us what the answer in the book was! I don't see how we can help you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top