Is (0,0) a Point on the Graph of y=x^-1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the point (0,0) is on the graph of the function y=x^-1. It is established that the function is undefined at x=0, as the simplification process relies on multiplying by x/x, which is not valid when x=0. The conversation highlights the confusion around using different mathematical rules, such as the power rule versus the square root rule, which have specific conditions for their validity. Ultimately, the conclusion is that (0,0) cannot be included in the graph due to the undefined nature of the function at that point. The clarification reinforces the importance of understanding the limitations of mathematical operations.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
If I'm asked to graph this function: y=\frac{1}{x^{-1}}

Is x=0 undefined? Obviously by the rule of powers, this equation is the same as y=x, but I'm unsure if the point (0,0) exists in this equation or not.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That function is not defined at x=0. To simplify it to x, you rely on the fact that you can multiply by 1=x/x. But x/x isn't defined when x=0, so you can't use simplification to get around the undefinedness at 0.
 
Yes, if I converted the power to a fraction as so: \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x}} then I'd be relying on that rule, but what about if I used the rule of powers, i.e. \frac{1}{x^a}=x^{-a} So simply, \frac{1}{x^{-1}}=x^{-(-1)}=x

It just seems to me that only sometimes this is undefined, depending on how you treat the problem.

Sort of like \sqrt{x^2}=|x| while (\sqrt{x})^2=x and defined for only x\geq 0
 
That rule explicitly requires x\ne0.
 
Ahh yes, of course!

Thanks tinyboss :smile:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top