Is 1+2+3+4+... equal to -1/12? A mind-boggling proof!

  • Thread starter Thread starter fargoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversial claim that the infinite series 1+2+3+4+... equals -1/12, as presented in a YouTube video. Participants express confusion regarding the validity of this claim in light of established rules about series convergence, particularly that a series diverges if its partial sums do not converge. Concerns are raised about the implications of summing strictly positive numbers resulting in a negative value, which contradicts basic mathematical principles. The original poster questions the legitimacy of the proof and seeks clarification on where the misunderstanding lies. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward skepticism about the claim's accuracy.
fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
I've see this neat proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-d9...eature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3085392237 (for some reason the youtube tag didn't work in preview...)
And now I don't see how what I've learned about series convergence is true...
I've been told that if a_n > b_n \forall n then \sum a_n > \sum b_n therefore, if \sum b_n is divergent then, \sum a_n must be too.
Also, If the partial sum diverges, the series is said to be divergent, isn't it?
And what about a_n \neq 0 for n that tends to infinity?
So many ways I could show this series diverges, yet he show it's equal to -1/12?

Where am I, or is he, wrong?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this cannot be true. The sum of all natural numbers up to N equals (as also shown in the end of the video) ## N(N+1)/2 ##. This obviously goes to infinity as N goes to infinity. And of course there is also no way how strictly positive numbers can add up to give a negative result.
 
That's what I was saying :)
So where is he wrong?
 
And as this link was posted we can safely close the thread.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top