Is 2.7177117771117777 irrational?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JsStewartFan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational
AI Thread Summary
The decimal 2.7177117771117777 is considered irrational because it does not exhibit a repeating pattern, which is a requirement for a number to be classified as rational. The discussion confirms that only decimals with repeating sequences can be expressed as fractions, thus categorizing them as rational. The number in question is not widely recognized as a famous mathematical constant, although it is close to the well-known number e (approximately 2.71828). Participants express curiosity about the generation of such a decimal pattern. Overall, the conclusion reached is that the number is indeed irrational.
JsStewartFan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is 2.71771177711177771111... irrational?

Homework Statement


I'm student teaching 8th graders Numbers and Operations. This is from an 8th grade activity I inherited with no "answer key." Is this decimal (with a pattern but not a repeating pattern) irrational? I am guessing it is, but I want to confirm it. Also, does anyone know if it is a "famous" number?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that all repeating decimals, such as 2.181818... or 3.156715671567... are rational because they can be represented by fractions a/b, where a and b are integers. And I have studied up on how to convert repeating decimals into fractions. I don't believe this "pattern" in the decimal number in question is "repeating," just a pattern. So I'm thinking it's irrational. But I'm curious about the number itself, also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


JsStewartFan said:
I don't believe this "pattern" in the decimal number in question is "repeating," just a pattern. So I'm thinking it's irrational. But I'm curious about the number itself, also.

Your intuition is correct. The decimal must be repeating the same pattern in order for it to be a rational number. Ergo, this is an irrational number.
 


Thanks! And you didn't recognize it, did you, as a well-known number?
 


I don't know. I've never seen it.
 


It is somewhat close to e=2.7182818284590...

ehild
 


Thanks, ehild and gb7nash! I wish I could think of how such a pattern could be generated. WTMTOMH, I guess.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top