Is a 15kg object capable of generating 147N upward force in water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter malek340
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating buoyancy, where the upward force is determined by the equation buoyancy force minus the object's weight. The correct formula involves the mass density of water and the volume of the submerged part of the object. A target upward force of 147N for a 15kg object is questioned, as it may be too high for smaller objects like ice cubes but appropriate for larger vessels like ocean liners. The importance of considering the specific volume and density of water is emphasized in designing buoyant systems. Overall, the calculations provided are deemed accurate for assessing buoyancy in various contexts.
malek340
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I believe that the way to calculate buoyancy is buoyancy force-weight of object= upward force, which is PVg-mg= upward force. If I'm wrong please tell me. I set a target of 147N(15kg) upward force for my project product. Is it that strong? Give me your thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maths looks right.

15kG is about the weight of two Bowling balls.
 
If your "P" is the mass density of water and V is the volume of water of that part of the object below water, then, yes, the bouyancy force is PVg. The total force would be that minus the weight, mg. When the object is "floating", the two must cancel so that the total force is 0, neither up nor down.

As for a target bouyancy of 147 N, what is your question about it? For an icecube that would be much to high. For an ocean liner, it would be much too low!
 
I've designed many many buoyant systems for seawater. If figure volume in cubic feet and multiply by 60 lbf per cubic foot. The water is a little heavier than that, but I like the margins in case my material absorbs a little water.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top