Buoyant force and ambient air pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between buoyant forces and ambient air pressure in a specific setup involving a buoyant object, a support structure, and water. Participants explore how these forces affect the movement of water and the conditions under which air pressure influences buoyancy, including scenarios with and without an air pipe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether the buoyant force from water can push water out of a container without an air pipe, suggesting that air pressure also contributes to the overall dynamics.
  • Another participant proposes that the overall height of the water increases in a tank setup, indicating the use of conservation of energy to analyze the situation.
  • Some participants clarify that if the walls of the setup are submerged, the water will return to the main body of water, raising questions about the height of the water in relation to the buoyant object.
  • A participant discusses the energy available from raising a submerged buoyant object and how it relates to the work done against the weight of the water and the atmospheric pressure.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for the buoyant force to create a vacuum in the absence of an air pipe, which would require overcoming both the head of water and atmospheric pressure.
  • Another participant questions whether the buoyant force can lift only the volume of water equal to the object itself or if it is insufficient to lift any water due to the greater weight of the water above.
  • One participant states that when an object is immersed in water, the upward buoyant force equals the weight of the displaced water, while also noting the downward forces acting on the object.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the role of air pressure and the conditions under which buoyant forces can effectively displace water. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing models and interpretations of the physical scenario presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding the setup, including the presence of walls, the dimensions of the tanks, and the effects of atmospheric pressure, which may influence the outcomes discussed.

gloo
Messages
261
Reaction score
2
I wanted to inquire as to a thought I have on a situation with buoyancy and air pressure.

In the first slide (slide 1), I am showing a situation where a buoyant object is pushing up on a support wall through a fixed wall that has water in it. Here are the factors:

1. The net buoyant force of the hollow object is 500 N (pushing upward)
2. The support structure is 300N in weight (purple)
3. The support structure is flush up against the inside of the horizontal walls and do not allow passage of water down
4. The friction is 50N (walls against the support structure horizontal wall; the vertical pole through the bottom fixed wall (grey)

My query is... would this buoyant push from the water below be able to push the water up and out to spill over the sides and back into the main body of water leaving the area below empty with just air? I was thinking it would not need the air pipe to allow air to come in and equalize the air pressure since the air is also pushing down on all the water? But I am wrong? I believe that only with the air pipe will the net force upward (500N up minus (300N + 50N) = 150 N --- would be able to push the water up and out leaving the empty space?

upload_2016-6-17_13-18-39.png


upload_2016-6-17_13-19-31.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can see it clearer if you put the setup in a tank... what happens is the overall height of the water increases.
Then you can use conservation of energy to work out what's possible.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You can see it clearer if you put the setup in a tank... what happens is the overall height of the water increases.
Then you can use conservation of energy to work out what's possible.
I guess I didn't clarify...but if you look a little more closely, the water will fall back into the body of water because the walls are beneath the surface of the water. I am guessing you mean if the walls were much taller it would raise the water upward?
 
No - I mean the main body of the water ... assume it is in a tank that has walls that are not pictured.
The small tank on top of the support I get is under water ...

Raising a submerged but buoyant object volume V through height h through water (w) makes energy ##\rho_{w}Vgh## available to do work.
You have a massive piston - so some work is done to lift that.
The water in the small tank where the top of the piston is, that has to be raised enough to reach the top of the tank ... but after that it contributes to the overall height of the main body of water which must be in a container of some kind ... even if that container is the sides of the ocean on a planet or whatever.

You may want to say that the main body of water is so large that the water makes a negligible increase in height ... OK.
But that could be where funny results can come from later.

You may prefer a model where the bottom of the piston is in one tank of water and the top in another ... and the water displaced from the top tank is just lost.
What I am doing is trying to provide you with models to help you work out what is going on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gloo
Simon Bridge said:
No - I mean the main body of the water ... assume it is in a tank that has walls that are not pictured.
The small tank on top of the support I get is under water ...

Raising a submerged but buoyant object volume V through height h through water (w) makes energy ##\rho_{w}Vgh## available to do work.
You have a massive piston - so some work is done to lift that.
The water in the small tank where the top of the piston is, that has to be raised enough to reach the top of the tank ... but after that it contributes to the overall height of the main body of water which must be in a container of some kind ... even if that container is the sides of the ocean on a planet or whatever.

You may want to say that the main body of water is so large that the water makes a negligible increase in height ... OK.
But that could be where funny results can come from later.

You may prefer a model where the bottom of the piston is in one tank of water and the top in another ... and the water displaced from the top tank is just lost.
What I am doing is trying to provide you with models to help you work out what is going on.

Thanks for the input -- my main query is that :

1. Water is raised up in the small tank
2. Air is replaced below? Without the air pipe...it probably a lot more work because of the air pressure above?
 
Re the first drawing...Without the air pipe the buoyancy force has to create a vacuum in the top container - so it would have to overcome the head of water in the top container plus atmospheric pressure.

With the air pipe just the head of water.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gloo and Simon Bridge
CWatters said:
Re the first drawing...Without the air pipe the buoyancy force has to create a vacuum in the top container - so it would have to overcome the head of water in the top container plus atmospheric pressure.

With the air pipe just the head of water.
CWatters said:
Re the first drawing...Without the air pipe the buoyancy force has to create a vacuum in the top container - so it would have to overcome the head of water in the top container plus atmospheric pressure.

With the air pipe just the head of water.

So I am a little confused still on what the buoyant force can do. I know there is a buoyant force pushing up on the water in the container. With these following numbers :

Net buoyant force of the hollow object (including weight of materials = 1000N
Weight of purple structure = 200 N
Friction = 20N
Force of water above in container = 4000 N

Can the buoyant force lift up only the volume of water equal to itself (i.e. the volume of empty space )? Or it can't lift any of the water up because the weight of the water is much greater?

upload_2016-6-20_20-8-0.png
 
When an object is immersed in water, there is an upwards force on it equal to the weight (mg) of the water displaced.
There will also be downwards forces on it - like the weight of whatever the immersed object is made of and the weight of whatever the immersed object is supposed to support.

In your example (above) you have 4200N down and only 1000N up - so, even without friction, the net force is downwards, so float B will sink under the weight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K