B Is a Black Hole Really Waterproof?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ozfer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
Water, like all matter, will fall into a black hole, indicating that black holes are not waterproof. The discussion emphasizes that the concept of waterproofing is irrelevant when considering the nature of black holes. Ultimately, water is not resistant to the gravitational pull of a black hole. The conclusion is that black holes cannot be considered waterproof. The topic is closed for further discussion.
Ozfer
So the title pretty much sums it up. I'm having a heated discussion on this topic with a friend so yes/no at the end would be nice :wink:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The question has no relevant meaning.

Water will fall into a black hole just like any other matter. A better statement would be that water is not black-hole proof.
 
  • Like
Likes lekh2003
There is no better answer which could be given.

Thread closed.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top