Is a Commutative Group with a^2=1 Always a Group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsjock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
physicsjock
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I have a small question about groups,

If you have a comunitative 'group' H = <a in H : a2=1>,

Is that enough information to show that it is a group, without knowing the binary operation?

say b is also in H

then a*b=b*a

(a*b)*(b*a) = (a*a)*(b*b) = 1 (since its comunitative)

So that shows there is an identity, and each element is it's own inverse

It's also associative so everything is satisfied for H to be a group,

So only knowing these two properties of this group can show that it is indeed a group?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, and how do you know it's associative?

Give us more precise name of your starting structure.
 
physicsjock said:
So only knowing these two properties of this group can show that it is indeed a group?
No, if you have some set H, with a binary operation HxH → H, such that all (a,a) maps to same element (that we may call 1), then this will in general not be a group. You have that every element is its own inverse wrt to the element 1, but 1 is not a unit element (which requires that a*1=1*a=a), and you do not have associativity as there are absolutely no conditions set to the value of a*b with a≠b.

I didnt understand the word "comunitative", but you may have meant commutative, which btw is not taking you a lot further to making this into a group.
 
So I have a set <a in H : a^2=1> where H is a commutative group,
1 being the identity, and aa means a*a, sorry should have specified before

I have been told it is a group but I just want to see if I can justify it myself, having no clear binary operation confused me.

So I know each element is it's own inverse, and it does contain an identity element, 1

To show associativity , for a,b and c in the set

(a*b)*c=a*(b*c)

(a*c)*b= b*(a*c)

(a*c)*b= (a*c)*b

so all boxes ticked?
 
Last edited:
Maybe you want to show that subset of H <a in H : a^2=1> is a subgroup of H?

In this case, you don't need to worry about associativity etc., only under closure of operations. There are three operation you need to verify, one nullary - taking unit, one unary - taking inverse and one binary - multiplication.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top