Is a Cubed Normally Distributed Variable Still Normal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jellis78
  • Start date Start date
Jellis78
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I'm wrestling with the following problem:

Suppose a variable is normaly distributed, then is this same variable still normal distributed when raised to the power of 3? I know if the variable is raised to the power of 2 a chi-squared distribution is obtained, but what happens when raised to the power of 3?

I have a feeling that the variable is still normaly distributed but I can't prove it. Let me take this question one bit further; does anyone know what kind of transformation I have to apply to obtain the standard deviation of the transformed varaible?

Thank you and nice weekend

Jellis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to your first question is, in general no. Any non-linear transformation of a normally distributed variable gives one that is not linearly distributed. I'm not sure why you would accept that the square of a normally distributed variable is not normally distributed but think that the cube would be!
How you would obtain the standard deviation of a transformed variable depends strongly on the transformation.
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

Of course, If the chi-square distribution is not normal then the cubic isn't normaly distributed either.

I made a excel sheet in which I made the mistake to raise the 3rd power of the frequency instead of the variable of the distribution... No wonder it still looked normally distributed

I still meant the transformation of raising the 3rd power of a normal distributed variable. So let me rephrase th equestion:

What kind of mathematical operation do I need to do to obtain the standard deviation of this ‘new’ variable?

Hope you can link me some sort of solution on the web...:rolleyes:

Jellis
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top