Programs Is a double major worth it? (Physics, chemistry)

AI Thread Summary
Considering a double major for a career as a forensic scientist raises important points about employment prospects and the relevance of coursework. While a double major may seem beneficial, it’s crucial to recognize that lab technicians typically specialize in specific areas such as molecular biology, chemical analysis, or ballistics, rather than being generalists across multiple disciplines. The discussion highlights that pursuing a double major might not enhance job readiness if the focus is on mastering a particular skill set. The recommendation from the physics department to consider a materials science track may not align closely with forensic science, as materials science often leans towards engineering principles rather than forensic applications. Ultimately, while gaining additional knowledge is valuable, the practicality of a double major should be weighed against the demands of specialization in forensic science.
hawkeye295
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Yes, another one of these threads. GET OVER IT! Just kidding LOL.

A few disclaimers: I do have a practical reason for considering a double major. A career path I have been strongly considering in the past two years is to become a forensic scientist (crime lab technician). Also, this isn't just a "CSI phase", because I've read several books and web-articles on the actual aspects of the career. Plus, I don't watch those shows anyway. Jeopardy! is my favorite.

It might be a bit naïve to think a double major gives you better employment prospects, but I honestly don't see why not in this case, considering both fields can be applied on the job (ballistics, toxicology, accident reconstruction, etc.)

Do you think all of the extra work would be worth it? I asked the physics department at the school I'm attending and they recommended the "materials science" track. I checked it out, and it seems like that's more of an engineering route.

If it's stupid and unrealistic, don't be afraid to say so. I can handle it. I'd be willing to settle with a different science or math related career.

Thanks everyone for your input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lab technicians only do one thing. They do molecular biology. They do chemical analysis. They do ballistics. They don't do all three. Your job is to carry out these analysis perfectly, because a lot of it depends on it. Therefore, you can't do one thing one day, then another the other. At your lab you are to be the expect in one or several related analysis methods. If people rotate, no one knows anything.

Engineering is completely unrelated. You then will be building stuff, solving engineering problems, rather than doing lab analysis.

If you already exactly know what you want to do, combining two science degrees are never worth it. But then again, people here sometimes seem to have a different definition of a 'double major' or 'double degree'. To me it means you get two degrees, but you get some shortcuts in having to do only one thesis or internship and shared courses of course cut down the ECTS from 360/6 years to something more manageable. Others seem to mean to just get the same amount of credits, but just divide it among two subjects.

They probably direct you to material science at the physics department because physics has so little to do with forensics.
Like most science subjects, material science can also be taught the engineering way or the science way.
 
  • Like
Likes hawkeye295
If you have the time and the strength to learn more, then learning more is better than learning less. Even so, as Almeisan suggests, be careful about taking short-cuts. You may need more time for double-major
 
  • Like
Likes hawkeye295
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top