Programs Is a Dual Degree in EE and Math a Good Idea?

AI Thread Summary
A high school senior, Austin, is entering university with 68 completed credits and is considering pursuing a dual degree in mathematics, potentially extending his studies to four years due to his scholarship. Discussions highlight the benefits of higher math in fields like electrical engineering (EE), computer science, and physics, while cautioning about potential scheduling conflicts that could prolong his college experience. Participants advise careful planning of course schedules to avoid complications and suggest that a dual major could be advantageous, especially for graduate studies in EE. However, they also warn that pursuing mathematics at a deeper level can lead to challenges in understanding complex concepts. Ultimately, balancing interests in both fields is crucial for a successful academic path.
sheldonrocks97
Gold Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
I am a high school senior going into university this fall. I have completed many general education credits and I am going in as a freshman with 68 credits already completed.

Because of this, I am interested in instead of taking 2 1/2 or 3 years in university I would be willing to take 4 years to get a dual degree, since my scholarship is good for that long.

I was thinking about getting my dual degree in mathematics. Is that a good idea? Do you have any suggestions of what I should get a dual degree in? Let me know what you have to say.

Thanks,

Austin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Higher math can be really beneficial in EE, especially if you deal with computers. Other useful fields are computer science, physics, and mechanical engineering.

But, before you commit to anything like this, you should study the course schedules for your department. You'll probably find that certain core classes are always offered at a specific time, and that some required classes are not offered every semester. You may run into serious scheduling conflicts that could drag your college career out much longer than you expect if you don't plan ahead.
 
Sounds like a good idea to me, but don't get TOO carried away with. I wish I would have stuck with my plan of an EE and math double major, but I got carried away for a while and just switched to math. So, just don't drop the EE major without very serious consideration. Particularly if you are one of those people who starts to like the math better because it emphasizes deeper conceptual understanding. In the long run, math, at the research level, can be a disaster area for people who like to understand things for themselves, in my experience, despite the impression you might get from just an undergraduate degree.

If that sounds surprising, have a look at these:

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/99506/blackbox-theorems

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/10/01/voevodskys-mathematical-revolution/

From which, I will highlight the following quote from a Fields' medalist, no less, tacitly admitting (and even going further, as if it were hardly even worthy of note) that mathematicians are proving theorems that they don't even fully understand themselves:

"He also predicts that this will lead to a blossoming of collaboration, pointing out that right now, collaboration requires an enormous trust, because it’s too much work to carefully check your collaborator’s work. With computer verification, the computer does all that for you, so you can collaborate with anyone and know that what they produce is solid. That creates the possibility of mathematicians doing large-scale collaborative projects that have been impractical until now."

So, there goes that idea I had of understanding things for myself that made me change my major to math and then go to grad school for it, right out the window. Silly of me not to see it earlier.

So, if any other EE out there finds themselves tempted by math, beyond a minor or double-major because they mistakenly get the impression that EE is plug and chug and math is about understanding, I hope that will give them pause. It's a big case of "out of the frying pan, into the fire". They'd be much better off, just fighting the good fight in EE and trying really hard to understand what what they learn there. Unless, of course, they happen to be a fan of working with big black-box theorems they don't understand. My father is a professor of EE and reports that the situation seems to be better with regard to these issues.

The double major would be particularly good if you plan to go to grad school for EE, though, in areas like signal processing or control theory.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top