Is a flux density of 227.6 T realistic for a 5cm bar magnet?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the realism of a flux density measurement of 227.6 T for a 5 cm bar magnet. Participants explore the validity of this value in the context of typical magnetic field strengths for various types of magnets.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the 227.6 T measurement, suggesting it is too high based on known values for small magnets.
  • Another participant references a source indicating that smaller rare Earth magnets typically have a flux density around 1.25 T, while older style iron bar magnets may range from 0.25 to 0.5 T.
  • A later reply indicates that the original poster recalculated their value to approximately 0.22 T after realizing an error in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the initial measurement of 227.6 T, with some asserting it is unrealistic while others provide context for typical values. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the original calculation's accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the flux density values depend on the type of magnet and that the original measurement may have involved errors in calculation.

Cici2017
Flux density of a magnet is about how many T?

In an experiment, I obtained the number 227.6 T.

Is this a sensible value for a small (5cm long) bar magnet? Thank you~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tesla and Farad are the two units where if you have 1 of it, you have a LOT.
 
Cici2017 said:
In an experiment, I obtained the number 227.6 T.
how did you get that figure
show some working so that some one may be able to help you understand where you went wrong

so you should have gleaned from @CWatters link that strength of one of those smaller rare Earth magnets is around 1.25T

Therefore if your magnet is a typical older style iron bar magnet, it may be around 0.25 to 0.5 T at the mostDae
 
Yes, thank you everyone. I found that I did something wrong in my calculations. Now I have a value around 0.22 T.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K