Programs Is a PhD required for applied physics in non-academic settings?

AI Thread Summary
In non-academic settings, a PhD is generally not required to work as an applied physicist. Many industry positions focus on on-the-job training, allowing individuals with at least a BS in applied physics to find employment and apply their knowledge effectively. While some specialized research positions or consultancy roles may necessitate a PhD, most industry roles prioritize practical experience over advanced degrees. Employers often value candidates with several years of relevant work experience more than those with a PhD in a related field. Continuous professional development is typically integrated into the job, alleviating the need for individuals to independently keep their knowledge up-to-date.
Mathnomalous
Messages
83
Reaction score
5
Would a PhD be required to work as an applied physicist in non-academic settings? Or are there a good number of locations, positions, etc. where a person with a least a BS in applied physics may be employed to directly apply her/his knowledge of applied physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an industry setting, generally, no. A PhD is not required. Many industry positions like to do their training on the job, so will have training programmes set up for new employees (or graduate training programmes).
 
That's great! I may not have to spend additional years in college; I may stop at a master's in an applied field, no? Of course, I would keep my knowledge up-to-date.

In what kind of situation would a non-academic employer require a PhD?
 
Mathnomalous said:
Of course, I would keep my knowledge up-to-date.

In what kind of situation would a non-academic employer require a PhD?

If you're working in a graduate job in the field, you probably won't really have to worry about keeping your knowledge 'up to date' on your own - that will be part of your job! and be something that happens just because you're doing it every day.

There are some specialist research positions or consultancy roles that may require PhDs in industry: but generally industry roles are all about the experience. Someone who has been working in their field for 5 years is much more valuable than someone that has a mildly related PhD. I've only rarely seen industry jobs asking specifically for candidates with a PhD.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
178
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
459
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top