Is a problem-based approach beneficial for engineering education?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Education
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the merits of a problem-based educational approach for an electrical engineering degree compared to traditional lecture-based courses. The problem-based model involves students working in groups to tackle a new problem every two weeks, which includes brainstorming sessions with professors, personal study, lab work, and presentations of their solutions. This method emphasizes active learning and practical application of knowledge rather than passive absorption of information. In contrast, traditional education relies on structured courses and lectures. Participants express curiosity about the effectiveness of the problem-solving approach, with references to similar methodologies like the Moore method in mathematics, which encourages students to engage deeply with material through problem-solving and presentations. The conversation highlights the potential benefits of experiential learning versus conventional education methods.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
"Problem approach" education?

Sorry I don't know the exact name for this kind of education in english. One of the Universities I'd like to attend offers a problem based approach for it's electrical engineering degree (I want to become a EE). Basically, you are given a problem every 2 weeks that you have to "solve". The week starts by a meeting with a professor in groups of 12-15 students to brainstorm about the problem and the things required to solve it. After that, there's a personal study time where you have to read and do some exercises on a given subject. You then have to do some lab work, or work in teams, and "solve" the problem given to you. At the end of the 2 weeks you have an exam (maybe a written math exam if the problem resolved more around maths, maybe some programmation if that's what the 2 weeks problem was about, etc.), and you have to present your solution.

The other universities offer a "traditional" approach, with courses given to you. The problem approach doesn't really have courses per se.

Anyone have input on this? Should I stick to the tried and true "course" formula, or try the "problem solving approach"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In mathematics, there is the Moore method, which has gained some traction at a number of universities. It is somewhat similar to what you have described: instead of presenting a traditional lecture, the instructor outlines a list of theorems and problems, and the students are expected to solve them (sometimes individually, sometimes in groups) and present their results in class.

Here is a website in which an instructor discusses his experience teaching Moore method classes over a period of 30 years at several universities:

http://legacyrlmoore.org/reference/mahavier1.html

I don't have any personal experience with the Moore method so cannot comment further.
 


I like the sounds of it.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top