It doesn't do to get too hung up on terminology.
When I was very young I came across the idea of the 'equivalent circuit' of a transistor. This involved the notion of replacing an actual transistor with a circuit consisting of 'fundamental' and ideal resistors, capacitors and current sources with fictitious characteristics. This equivalent circuit, if you could actually build it, would behave like a transistor but it is only a fiction which is used to gain an understanding of the actual behaviour of a transistor. I worried a lot about this at the time because I hadn't actually ever got as far as designing a circuit containing a transistor. I really thought you could build one.
Another, easier, example I came across was the equivalent circuit of a battery (an ideal emf in series with a small resistor - the internal resistance).
Those were both examples in which you can say we use "fundamental" elements but, in neither case, can you pick up and handle any of these elements. A pure resistor can't exist because it will have physical size and, hence, will have inductive and capacitative qualities. The same goes for every other circuit element you can think of.