Is an open interval in R really uncountable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ak416
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval
ak416
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Ok i know it should be because it has the same cardinality as R and R is uncountable. But take for example (0,1). Heres a method I would use to count all its elements:

0.1,...,0.9
0.01,...,0.99
0.001,...,0.999
.
.
.
0.(n-1 zeros)1,...,0.(n 9's)
.
.
.

so count starting from the top left and keep going right till you reach the end of the line then count the in the same direction for the next line and so on.
Doesnt this define a bijection from (0,1) to Z+ ? Take any number in (0,1). If it has n digits after its decimal, go down n lines to find its corresponding integer (it will be 9+99+...+(n-1 9's) + the number * 10^n )

Whats wrong with my reasoning?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ok i think i got it. A real number can have an infinite number of decimals!
 
Correct!
At each step, you have only counted up rationals with finite decimal expansions.

Not a single irrational number occurs anywhere for any n.
 
And only a small fraction of the rational numbers!

ak416, a lot of people just can't grasp that. I'm impressed that you were able to realize the error so quickly.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top