Is any good way on how to deal with Newton Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Newtonian mechanics can seem abstract and complicated, but it's foundational for understanding more advanced topics like relativity and quantum mechanics. To tackle its complexities, it's essential to specify what aspects are challenging, as detailed questions yield better guidance. Many people use Newton's laws intuitively in daily life, indicating a basic understanding is already present. Practicing with good textbooks and utilizing online resources, such as YouTube, can significantly enhance comprehension. Engaging with the material actively will make the learning process easier and more effective.
alnix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
just asking, because it seems abstract and complicated for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think Newtonian mechanics is abstract and complicated, then I don't recommend that you attempt to study any relativity (either GR or SR) or any quantum mechanics.

If your statement is a plea for help, it is rather vague and non-specific. What seems abstract? What is complicated about it? The more details you provide, the more specific help and suggestions you will receive about overcoming your difficulties.
 
alnix said:
just asking, because it seems abstract and complicated for me.

Your question itself appears abstract to me, and very, very vague.

BTW, do you know that you are using Newton's laws right now, and have been using it every since you were born? In fact, there are many things you do automatically simply because you've understood it and seen in numerous times already.

Zz.
 
alnix said:
just asking, because it seems abstract and complicated for me.
Good thing you're equipped with a human brain - a tool particularly well suited for dealing with abstract and complicated topics, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
alnix said:
just asking, because it seems abstract and complicated for me.

Get a good book and practice...everything becomes easier with practice.
 
Its not so bad if you watch youtube videos of course I refer to only A-level stuff at the moment. For the higher stuff in classical mechanics in uni like angular momentum and the other vector crap involving matrix mathematics I haven't come across yet but example of what I mean is



I am assuming your on about the rudimentary stuff I dunno.

PS> I forgot all that calculus stuff too. I have yet to encounter such difficulties though I haven't really started my subject yet just been reading up and researching myself at the moment. First damn unit though is quantum phenomena and electricity where I would have preferred starting at forces and motion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top