Is being good at precalculus an indicator

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirtysocks45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precalculus
AI Thread Summary
Being proficient in precalculus is generally seen as a positive indicator for success in calculus and higher mathematics. A strong grasp of precalculus concepts equips students with essential tools, such as algebra and trigonometry, which are crucial for tackling calculus. Enthusiasm for learning and a proactive approach to understanding challenging subjects, like physics or computer science, can also contribute to overall mathematical success. However, pure mathematics diverges significantly from precalculus, emphasizing proof and creativity rather than mere application of formulas. Exploring pure math through accessible resources can help gauge interest and aptitude in this area. Ultimately, while precalculus proficiency is beneficial, dedication and effort remain vital for success in advanced math courses.
dirtysocks45
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Is being good at precalculus an indicator that you will be good at calculus and later maths? Right now precalculus comes so naturally to me and I hardly struggle. And when I do struggle, I like learning how to figure where I'm going wrong unlike when I'm struggling at physics or computer science. Is this a good sign? I may want to do either applied or pure math in college. Also I got a 720 on the math section of the SAT on the first try.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Enthusiasm for learning new things is the only reliable indicator that you will be good at learning new things. :) You sound quite enthusiastic at the moment. Your ability with the concepts of precalculus will aid you well in your ability to learn calculus easily, but is not the dominant factor.
I don't know your current circumstances, but it may be the case that you will find a different approach to the topics you are struggling in more palatable. Try going to your local library (or using the internet) and searching for basic books on those topics or asking your teacher about them. Tutors may help as well.
 
Last edited:
Pure mathematics is very unlike what is done is precalculus. Pure mathematics focuses on proving statements. Creativity is an important aspect there. Precalculus is usually just applying a formula and getting the arithmetic right.

You should work through a pure math book to see if you like it. Yes, you are able to work through a pure math book just fine without having done calculus. For example, get this book https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486474178/?tag=pfamazon01-20 It is very cheap and shows what mathematics is actually about. And it is suitable for high school students (and that does not mean that it is dumbed down).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Focusing on just calculus and not higher math:

Being good at pre-calc says that you have the tools to do well in calculus.

In my experience, people do poorly in calculus because they don't have good command of the needed tools (i.e., they struggle with algebra and/or trig).

So I'd say yes, being good at pre-calc is a good indicator that you'll be good in calculus. Of course, you still have to work hard!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
380
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top