Is Calculating Work Done by Gravity as Simple as It Seems?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating work done by gravity involves understanding that the gravitational force changes with radial distance from the Earth, as described by the Universal Law of Gravitation. As an object approaches the center of the Earth, the force of gravity increases, but this is only true until the object is within the Earth's radius. Once inside, only the mass beneath the object contributes to the gravitational force, according to the shell theorem. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly defining limits for integration, suggesting using the Earth's radius instead of zero. Overall, the complexities of gravitational force and work done require careful consideration of the object's position relative to the Earth's mass distribution.
Martin23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I was thinking about the Universal Law of Gravitation, and the force of an object depends on the radial distance from Earth for simplicity. As an object travels to the center of the Earth the Fg increases as the radial distance decreases.F=(G*m*m*1)/(r^2). Knowing that the Force is not constant, the work done by gravity would be ∫F*dr from lower limit of r to upper limit of 0. Now, if you put the F in terms of r you get ∫[(G*m*m)/(r^2)]*dr from r to 0. As I tried to solve for Work, I arrived at 1/0 and now I am stuck. Was all this valid or just nonsense? If you think about this in vector form 3 dimensions, it is more understandable to me at least. Here is a picture of my work. Help please.
 

Attachments

  • Work.jpg
    Work.jpg
    18.7 KB · Views: 490
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what you mean by r being 0. Are you really taking the limit of integration as the center of Earth? I would think you would want to substitute 0 for the radius of Earth. Or even better, just use r_initial and r_final as your limits, it gives you a more general answer. Then just plug-n-chug for your solution.
 
oh your right haha. 0 radial distance would be like super imposed on Earth hahaa
they would occupy the same space right? haha ty.
 
Martin23 said:
As an object travels to the center of the Earth the Fg increases as the radial distance decreases.

No, it doesn't. When the radial distance is less than the Earth's radius, only the mass inside the radial distance "counts" in calculating the gravitational force. Google "shell theorem" for details.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top