Is cyber bullying worse than in person bullying?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenVitale
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between cyberbullying and traditional face-to-face bullying. One viewpoint argues that cyberbullying is not inherently worse because it is an elective activity; individuals can choose to log off and disengage, unlike the unavoidable nature of physical bullying encountered in daily life. Critics of the article's conclusions suggest that the research may be skewed due to differing characteristics of the populations studied. They also challenge the notion that cyberbullying makes victims feel more vulnerable, arguing that physical bullying can be more damaging and immediate. While acknowledging that cyberbullying is real and has serious consequences, the discussion emphasizes the differences in accountability and perceived safety in online environments, suggesting that anonymity can embolden individuals to engage in harmful behavior without fear of repercussions.
BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
BenVitale said:
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?

no, disagree. let's step back and think about which is an elective activity and which is not. a kid has no choice but walk home from school, and possibly be accosted by bullies. there's always a choice involved in logging on to facebook, or whether to pay any attention to cyber-taunting. one cannot easily (or at all) be turned off, and one is as easy as walking away from it or logging off.

the article puts figures to their conclusions and thus appears to lend credence to their hypotheses, but (so far as the article is concerned... i have not delved into further detail of the study for instance) i conjecture that the sampling is skewed due to the population having certain characteristics that may not be common to both groups (i.e. the physically bullied and the digitally bullied).

one more point: "Cyber-bullying victims do not see and may not even know who their harasser is, which can make them feel more vulnerable". huh? wait a sec. being physically attacked every day during or after school somehow makes one feel *less* vulnerable than engaging in an elective activity that one can painlessly log off from and escape? what a bizarre world these researchers live in, that they can conclude that physical abuse appears preferable to digital. essentially, "never have i felt more vulnerable than sitting in front of a computer monitor, helplessly strapped to facebook absorbing taunt after taunt. i so wish i were being chased down the street, having my stomach kicked, coat torn and mud stuffed down my shirt. oh the good old days!"

hogwash.

now, no one conclude i think that cyber-bullying isn't real, or doesn't have real results. i agree it is, and does. I'm simply responding to the question of degree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What do you think of this http://www.geektown.ca/2010/10/student-death-raises-cyber-bullying-issue-.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cyber-bully doesn't have to be anonymous though. Whether or not they are, the internet offers them a sense of security and obscurity. I would even say that anything devolves when a structure of accountability is missing or diminishing. As for the person who feels victimized, I suppose it could even stem from not having an outlet or any sense of justice from the situation that could lead people to feel it's worse than verbal abuse spoken by peers or others in a face-to-face situation. Either way, I think it's safe to say that the majority of people feel safer saying horrendous things to others when they're saying it in an environment with no consequences. Obviously that doesn't stand for every situation, but I think that's a fair generalization.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...

Similar threads

Back
Top