Is cyber bullying worse than in person bullying?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BenVitale
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between cyberbullying and in-person bullying, with participants debating the severity of each. One user argues that cyberbullying is less severe because it is an elective activity, contrasting it with the unavoidable nature of physical bullying. They suggest that the research cited in the article may be flawed due to skewed sampling. Ultimately, while acknowledging the real effects of cyberbullying, the user concludes that physical bullying may be perceived as less vulnerable than digital harassment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cyberbullying and its psychological impacts
  • Familiarity with the concept of anonymity in online interactions
  • Knowledge of research methodologies and sampling techniques
  • Awareness of the social dynamics of bullying in both physical and digital environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the psychological effects of cyberbullying on adolescents
  • Explore studies on the differences in victimization between physical and digital bullying
  • Investigate the role of anonymity in online harassment and its implications
  • Examine strategies for accountability in online interactions to mitigate bullying
USEFUL FOR

Educators, mental health professionals, parents, and anyone involved in anti-bullying initiatives will benefit from this discussion, as it provides insights into the complexities of bullying in both physical and digital contexts.

BenVitale
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
BenVitale said:
According to this article : http://www.news.com.au/technology/sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-cyber-bullying-really-hurts-me/story-e6frfro0-1225927833343

Do you agree that cyber bullying is worse than in person, face to face?

no, disagree. let's step back and think about which is an elective activity and which is not. a kid has no choice but walk home from school, and possibly be accosted by bullies. there's always a choice involved in logging on to facebook, or whether to pay any attention to cyber-taunting. one cannot easily (or at all) be turned off, and one is as easy as walking away from it or logging off.

the article puts figures to their conclusions and thus appears to lend credence to their hypotheses, but (so far as the article is concerned... i have not delved into further detail of the study for instance) i conjecture that the sampling is skewed due to the population having certain characteristics that may not be common to both groups (i.e. the physically bullied and the digitally bullied).

one more point: "Cyber-bullying victims do not see and may not even know who their harasser is, which can make them feel more vulnerable". huh? wait a sec. being physically attacked every day during or after school somehow makes one feel *less* vulnerable than engaging in an elective activity that one can painlessly log off from and escape? what a bizarre world these researchers live in, that they can conclude that physical abuse appears preferable to digital. essentially, "never have i felt more vulnerable than sitting in front of a computer monitor, helplessly strapped to facebook absorbing taunt after taunt. i so wish i were being chased down the street, having my stomach kicked, coat torn and mud stuffed down my shirt. oh the good old days!"

hogwash.

now, no one conclude i think that cyber-bullying isn't real, or doesn't have real results. i agree it is, and does. I'm simply responding to the question of degree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What do you think of this http://www.geektown.ca/2010/10/student-death-raises-cyber-bullying-issue-.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cyber-bully doesn't have to be anonymous though. Whether or not they are, the internet offers them a sense of security and obscurity. I would even say that anything devolves when a structure of accountability is missing or diminishing. As for the person who feels victimized, I suppose it could even stem from not having an outlet or any sense of justice from the situation that could lead people to feel it's worse than verbal abuse spoken by peers or others in a face-to-face situation. Either way, I think it's safe to say that the majority of people feel safer saying horrendous things to others when they're saying it in an environment with no consequences. Obviously that doesn't stand for every situation, but I think that's a fair generalization.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K