Is Dark Flow Considered a Fringe Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaos' lil bro Order
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Theory
AI Thread Summary
Dark Flow is viewed as a speculative concept within the cosmology community, with some suggesting it may have stemmed from observational or interpretational errors. Recent literature, including a strong refutation linked in the discussion, questions the validity of dark flow claims. The consensus appears to lean towards it being a fringe theory, lacking robust support from current research. Upcoming results from the Planck satellite are anticipated to provide further clarity on this topic. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate and uncertainty surrounding dark flow in cosmological studies.
Chaos' lil bro Order
Messages
682
Reaction score
2
I am curious if 'Dark Flow' is considered a fringe theory or not. I have been away from cosmology for a while and am trying to pick up the general consensus of the community on the leading theories today. Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm speaking from a base of pretty much utter ignorance, but I seem to recall some time back that dark flow had been basically discovered to be an observational mistake ... or perhaps it was an interpretational mistake, but in any case I think the whole thing went away. If others have more correct information, I'll be happy to hear about it.
 
Dark flow still looks very speculative to me.
 
Okay, thank you.
 
http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4233
The above link is a pretty strong refutation of the previous claims of dark flow. I am not sure what your definition of "fringe " is though. Planck should shed more light on this when it release results early next year.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top