Is energy conserved in this case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stereo_Chemist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a figure skater who increases her angular speed from 4 rad/s to 12 rad/s by reducing her moment of inertia. It is established that angular momentum is conserved, indicating that the moment of inertia decreases by a factor of three as the angular speed increases. The conversation then shifts to whether energy is conserved during this process. It is concluded that while mechanical energy is not conserved due to the work done by the skater to pull in her arms, total energy remains conserved as she converts chemical energy into mechanical energy. Thus, the skater's actions illustrate the principles of angular momentum and energy transformation in rotational motion.
Stereo_Chemist
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I recently had a question presented to me, and I am wondering if I got it right.

The question stated that a figure skater with a moment of inertia was rotating at an angular speed of 4 rad/s. Then the figure skater reduced her moment of inertia by bringing her arms in, and her speed increased to 12 rad/s. How much did her moment of inertia increase by.

For this part I know that angular momentum is conserved, so if the angular speed increased by a factor of 3, her moment of inertia must decrease by a factor of 3 also.

The next question then asked if energy was conserved in this case.

I figured that the only type of energy in this case was rotational energy and there is no translational energy, so you could simply use the formula

R.E. = 1/2Iw^2

So if you plug in the initial moment of inertia and angular speed and then the final one, you will get two different values, so energy is not conserved, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. Mechanical energy is not conserved. The skater has to do work to pull in her arms; she adds mechanical energy. (Of course total energy is conserved. She transformed chemical energy into mechanical energy.)
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top