Is Everything Really Energy According to Einstein's E=MC2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larry Farmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of Einstein's E=MC², with a strong assertion that everything is energy and that matter is fundamentally composed of energy. Participants express a desire for clarification and refutation of this view to deepen understanding. There is a distinction made between energy and other concepts, such as charge, which do not have energy units. The conversation also touches on the potential for a unified theory based on these principles. Overall, the debate highlights the complexities of defining energy and its relationship to matter according to Einstein's theory.
Larry Farmer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Everything is energy. I like to see someone refute this, to help me understand better Einstein's E =MC2, which seems to say all matter is composed of energy. I believe this may be the key to a unified theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy has a particular unit. That which does not have the unit of energy is not energy. Charge, for example, does not have the unit of energy and thus is not energy.
 
you are speaking of the measurement of energy, not energy its self. For instance atoms are energy, the specific amount of energy is not important here, as are the things that make up atoms, be it quarks photons strings or whatever. further more energy may have a unit. Just because you don't know what that unit is, does not mean it is not energy. I have gas in my car, the unit of energy it will supply to me is unknown at this time, but it is still potential energy.
 
Larry Farmer said:
Everything is energy. I like to see someone refute this, to help me understand better Einstein's E =MC2, which seems to say all matter is composed of energy. I believe this may be the key to a unified theory.

And where does the equation say that matter is energy? Matter is nowhere in that equation.
 
Larry Farmer said:
I like to see someone refute this
That isn't the way that this forum works. We don't discuss personal speculation even for the purpose of shooting it down.
 

Thread 'The Physics of unloading sand from a barge'

I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
View full post »

Similar threads

B E = mc^2, Wikipedia Mass–energy equivalence Clarification
Replies
18
Views
4K
I E Vector in E=mc2? Scalar Multiplication & Vectors
Replies
12
Views
1K
E=mc2 is more complicated that I originally thought
Replies
27
Views
5K
B Contributions to total energy in different areas of Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Can Matter Truly Exist in Four States According to Einstein's e=mc2?
Replies
18
Views
6K
B Which science communicator do you find to maintain the most accuracy?
Replies
30
Views
5K
Analyzing E=MC2: What Does Energy Have to Do with Distance?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B How can dark energy comprise 74% of the Universe?
Replies
36
Views
4K
Can We Harness Energy from Light to Power Space Travel?
Replies
12
Views
3K
Where to Discuss a Unified Theory of Energy on Physics Forums?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top