Is Exponential Needed for Non-Repeating Variable in Buckingham Pi Theorem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an exponent is necessary for non-repeating variables in the Buckingham Pi Theorem, specifically regarding the variable delta P. One source suggests that an exponent should be included for non-repeating variables, while another indicates that it is not required. The confusion arises from differing interpretations of dimensional analysis principles. Participants seek clarification on which approach is correct and whether an exponent for the non-repeating variable is essential. Ultimately, the debate highlights the nuances in applying the Buckingham Pi Theorem to dimensional analysis.
foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


https://projects.exeter.ac.uk/fluidflow/Courses/FluidDynamics3211-2/DimensionalAnalysis/dimensionalLecturese4.htmlaccording to this link , when we form the pi group , we need to put an exponent for the non-repeating variable ,( in this case , delta P is non-repeating variable , D , v and rho are repeating variable)
FXVC7K7.png
http://www.efm.leeds.ac.uk/CIVE/CIVE1400/Section5/dimensional_analysis.htm (refer to 7 )however , in this case , we do not have to put exponent on the non-repeating variable , the author just putF = (MLT^-2 ) instead of (MLT^-2)^d
k9bJMDc.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Which is correct ? the first or second one ? is exponential needed for non-repeating variable ?
P/s : this is not same as the question i posted in another thread...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump
 
anyone can reply ?
 
which is correct ?
 
bump
 
is it necessary to put exponent of d ? ??
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Choosing repeating variable in pi Buckingham theorem
Replies
24
Views
4K
Rules of choosing repeating variable in Buckingham pi theorem
Replies
5
Views
10K
Buckingham Pi Theorem: Choosing Common Variables
Replies
1
Views
2K
Variable Set Distribution - Buckingham Pi Theorum
Replies
1
Views
987

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top