Is F=Kx Always Necessary for Spring Forces?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter navneet9431
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the equation F = kx, which describes the spring force, is not always necessary for applied forces. It emphasizes that F can take any value independent of kx, particularly when considering scenarios where the mass is either stationary or moving at constant velocity. The participants highlight the importance of Newton's 2nd law in analyzing forces acting on a mass and conclude that equilibrium occurs when |F| = |kx|, while acceleration results when |F| ≠ |kx|.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's 2nd law of motion
  • Familiarity with spring force and Hooke's Law (F = kx)
  • Basic knowledge of equilibrium conditions in physics
  • Concept of mass and acceleration in dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Newton's 2nd law in various force scenarios
  • Study the conditions for equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the behavior of springs under different force applications
  • Learn about dynamic versus static equilibrium in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the relationship between forces and motion in spring systems.

navneet9431
Gold Member
Messages
107
Reaction score
9
Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg

Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg
    Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 886
Physics news on Phys.org
navneet9431 said:
Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?
 
I am not trying to invoke any law
jbriggs444 said:
Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?
 
Is the mass stationary?
 
No
sophiecentaur said:
Is the mass stationary?
 
navneet9431 said:
View attachment 232217
Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).
 
navneet9431 said:
No
Make the spring as weak as you like. Would F be zero?
 
Yes,F(on right) is a separate force applied to mass m other than the spring force acting on the left side.
russ_watters said:
The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).
 
Please write down for us your Newton's 2d law force balance equation on the mass M.
 
  • #10
F-kx=ma
Chestermiller said:
Please write down for us your Newton's 2d law force balance equation on the mass M.
 
  • #11
navneet9431 said:
F-kx=ma
Perfect. Does that answer your question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: navneet9431 and russ_watters
  • #12
navneet9431 said:
Yes,F(on right) is a separate force applied to mass m other than the spring force acting on the left side.
In that case it can have literally any value you choose to give it.
 
  • #13
So it means that F=/=kx
Chestermiller said:
Perfect. Does that answer your question?
 
  • #14
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?
 
  • #15
navneet9431 said:
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?

If the mass is stationary, or if F is applied in such a way that the mass is moving at a constant velocity. Look at the equation you wrote. What is "a" under these two situations?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: navneet9431
  • #16
Thanks
ZapperZ said:
If the mass is stationary, or if F is applied in such a way that the mass is moving at a constant velocity.

Zz.
 
  • #17
navneet9431 said:
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?

YOU will choose that.

If you choose |F|>|kx|, then m won't be at rest, but will have a constant acceleration rightwards.
If |F| = |kx|, then you have achieved an equilibrium, nothing moves. (In lab, this is how we calculate spring constant, where F=mg:biggrin:)

If |F| < |kx|, then you will have the spring pulling m leftwards.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
972
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K