Is f(x) Idempotent for Any Matrix B in M2(R)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielThrice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
DanielThrice
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
My professor gave us this query at the end of class, it contained two parts.
1. Show a ring is idempotent
2. Consider the degree one polynomial f(x) is an element of M2(R)[x] given by
f(x) = [0 1
______0 0]x + B
(so f(x) = the matrix []x + B).
For which B is an element of M2(R), if any, is f(x) idempotent?

I proved part 1:
If a2 = a, then a2 - a = a(a-1) = 0. If a does not equal 0, then a-1 exists in R and we have a-1 = (a-1a)(a-1) = a-1[a(a-1)] = a-10 = 0, so a-1 = 0 and a = 1. Thus 0 and 1 are hte only two idempotent elements in a division ring.

Part 2 I simply have no idea on though. How do I do this with a matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


DanielThrice said:
1. Show a ring is idempotent

I really fail to understand what you mean with this. In your proof, you seem to prove that a division ring has only two idempotents. This is of course correct. Is that what you mean by this question?

2. Consider the degree one polynomial f(x) is an element of M2(R)[x] given by
f(x) = [0 1
______0 0]x + B
(so f(x) = the matrix []x + B).
For which B is an element of M2(R), if any, is f(x) idempotent?

Well, you only have to calculate f(x)2 and compare it to f(x). For what values of B are they equal??
 


This is my progress so far...

Well, call the matrix M. Then you want that (Mx+B)^2=Mx+B in M2R[x][/math]. So we just have to perform the calculation and see what we get,

(Mx+B)^2=MxMx + MxB + BMx+B^2 = M^2x^2+(MB + BM)x + B^2 (the x-terms act like this (commutatively) by definition).

So, what is M^2? What must B be for M^2x^2+(MB + BM)x + B^2 = Mx+B?
 


Well, you know what M is: it is just the matrix

M=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0\end{array}\right)

So you can easily calculate M2. Furthermore, if you denote B by

B=\left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b\\ c & d\end{array}\right)

then it's not hard to calculate MB and BM...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top