MHB Is $\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{|x^{-x}|}$? Explained by y $\ln{x}=\ln{x^y}$ Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{|x^{-x}|}$ is examined in relation to the rule $y \ln{x}=\ln{x^y}$. While the rule allows for simplification, it does not permit bringing the exponent inside the absolute value in all cases. The transformation leads to $\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{\left(|x|^{1/x}\right)}$, but this does not equate to $\ln{|x^{-x}|}$. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of logarithmic properties when dealing with absolute values. Overall, the simplification does not hold universally.
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Is [math]\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{|x^{-x}|}[/math] because of the rule [math] y \ln{x}=\ln{x^y}[/math]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yep! And in general, you can bring the exponent inside the absolute value.
 
Rido12 said:
Yep! And in general, you can bring the exponent inside the absolute value.

Oh cool, usually my answer key makes these sorts of simplifications but it didn't for this one.
 
find_the_fun said:
Is [math]\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{|x^{-x}|}[/math] because of the rule [math] y \ln{x}=\ln{x^y}[/math]?

Applying that rule gives us:
$$\frac{\ln{|x|}}{x}=\ln{\left(|x|^{1/x}\right)}$$
And I'm afraid we can't generally bring that power inside the absolute signs.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top