Is GL(n,C) the biggest complex manifold within GL(2n,R)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Manifold
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether GL(n, C) is the largest complex manifold within GL(2n, R). It concludes that the term "biggest" is misleading; the correct term is "maximal." A maximal complex submanifold must be dense in GL(2n, R) and, if it exists, would equal the manifold itself. The argument presented indicates that not all manifolds can accommodate a complex structure, leading to the possibility of increasingly larger complex submanifolds without a definitive maximal entity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex manifolds
  • Familiarity with GL(n, C) and GL(2n, R) notation
  • Knowledge of manifold theory
  • Concept of maximal submanifolds
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of complex manifolds
  • Study the implications of maximal submanifolds in manifold theory
  • Explore the conditions under which a manifold can accommodate a complex structure
  • Investigate examples of dense submanifolds in various manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry and complex analysis, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of manifold theory and complex structures.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
So the question is simple: is [itex]GL_n(\mathbb C)[/itex] the biggest complex manifold in [itex]GL_{2n}(\mathbb R)[/itex]? Or is there another one that strictly contains it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure this question makes sense. First of all, you don't mean biggest, you mean to ask if it's maximal, which is still a fairly weird question. I mean, a complex manifold of (complex) dimension n union C^n is still a complex manifold.

As long is there is an open ball left in the complement, you can put a complex structure on that open ball, so you can conclude that any maximal complex submanifold would have to be dense in GL_2n(R) and therefore equal to it. I don't know whether GL_2n(R) can accommodate a complex structure, but this argument shows that there is never any such thing as a maximal complex submanifold of any manifold, unless it happens to equal the manifold itself. Not all manifolds have a complex structure, so if they don't, then what you would get is just bigger and bigger complex submanifolds containing any given one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K