Gravity Weaponry: Fact or Fiction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkxponent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion on gravity weaponry explores the feasibility of using gravity as a weapon, inspired by fictional portrayals in movies like Superman-Man of Steel. Participants note that while electric fields can be manipulated, gravity operates under different principles, making the development of gravity weapons unlikely in the near future. The conversation highlights the significant differences between electric and gravitational forces, including the absence of negative gravitational charges and the weaker gravitational interactions. Some speculate about the potential for high-density masses to influence Earth's gravitational field, but this remains theoretical. Overall, the consensus is that gravity weapons are not currently viable and may not be possible for centuries.
darkxponent
Messages
387
Reaction score
8
I recently watched Superman-Man of Steel. In the movie used some sort of gravity weapon to divert missiles. It also showed one thing they called 'The World Engine' to modify Earth's gravity.

When considering Gravity just another field like Electric field(to which it is very similar to). We do easily can change Electric field of place easily.

So, is that sort of gravoty weapon(modifier) possible in future or in present(might already be in use and not in my knowledge), Or is it just a fiction and remain fiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a universal law that every aspect of science can and will be used to create some sort of weapon. When it comes to gravity I recon that it won't be used for more than directing missiles and cannon balls.

But to actually get to your question, I think there are two important facts that make electric forces quite different. Even ignoring electrodynamics, the proportionality constant between the electric force and charge is not the (inertial) mass. That is, a charged object resists acceleration due to a parameter that is completely separate from the electric charge. This is not true for gravity. Also, the existence of a negative charge makes control of charged objects quite different.

On top of that, apart from tasers, I don't think there are any "electric" weapons. It would be very difficult to change the Earth's charge in any meaningful way.

My estimate is that there will not be any gravity weapons in the next few centuries. But fear not! As soon as the technology is available, I'm sure we will build black hole missiles that can force any object in the universe to collapse into a black hole.
 
There are a couple of difficulties with controling the gravitational field compared to controling the electric field. The first is that you can use negative electrical charges to cancel the field from positive electric charges, but there are no negative gravitational charges. The other is the strength of the interaction, the gravitational force between two protons is many orders of magnitude smaller than the electrical force between them.
 
Good answers!

I know that the magnitude of gravitational force is much smaller as compared to Electrical Forces, but this is the present situation or say the situation at Earth where we have masses of very less density. I am talking about black holes here, but is it would be possible to design some sort of high density masses with some technology, which can effect the Gravitational Field of Earth, in the similar fashion magnetic field of Earth can be modified easily.

Has someone ever tried to do so, i mean some failed attempts or something?

One more thing which might be off-topic: What about negative masses? Do they have existence in any theory?
 
darkxponent said:
Has someone ever tried to do so, i mean some failed attempts or something?

A thousand misinformed crackpots perhaps. It just doesn't work that way.

One more thing which might be off-topic: What about negative masses? Do they have existence in any theory?

Not in any accepted mainstream theory, no.
 
Thread closed for a bit.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top