Is Heat or Cold Insulation More Energy Consuming?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of energy consumption for heat versus cold protection, specifically in a controlled environment scenario. Participants explore the temperature change in a cube with air insulation, initially set at 10 degrees Celsius in a 30-degree environment, and later at 20 degrees Celsius in a 0-degree environment. The consensus is that the temperature inside the cube after one hour would be 15 degrees Celsius in both cases, indicating that the direction of heat flow does not significantly impact the outcome. Further analysis reveals that the rate of thermal energy transfer is proportional to the temperature difference, governed by a differential equation. The conversation concludes with an affirmation that the mathematical explanation clarifies the principles involved.
chienphong
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, guys!

(I created the same thread in the Engineering topic nearly a week ago but there has been no response. So I decided to move it here. Thanks.)

A few friends and I just had a discussion regarding heat and cold protection in general. Then came across a question of whether it is more difficult and energy consuming for heat protection or for cold protection, or is it the same. Let's take an example. We have a void cube (with air inside) of a certain peripheral insulation material. Let's say that we somehow adjust the inside temperature of the cube at 10 degrees Celsius and put the cube in a constant air (same type of air as in the cube) environment of 30 degrees Celsius and after 1 hour the temperature inside the cube is 15 degrees Celsius. The question is: if we adjust the inside temperature of the cube at 20 degrees Celsius and put the cube in a constant air (same type of air as in the cube) environment of 0 degree Celsius, what is the temperature inside the cube after 1 hour? Would it be 15 degress Celsius? or higher? or lower?

I would really appreciate the answer and full back up knowledge for that. Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

15C. So the answer to the general question is no, the direction of heat flow doesn't typically matter.
 
Thanks a lot Russ!

However, a little more explanation and few examples would be much appreciated.

I would bring up an example here. The specifications of the air conditioners we are using show that they consume pretty much more power for heating than for cooling. Is it then just a matter of different technologies?

Thanks.
 
15C. So the answer to the general question is no, the direction of heat flow doesn't typically matter.

[STRIKE]I don't think that's quite right.[/STRIKE] never-mind, I used the wrong givens. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_cooling#Equations_.28Newton.27s_law_of_cooling.29". You are however correct that the direction doesn't matter.

In short, the rate of transfer of thermal energy should be proportional to the temperature difference between the cube and environment. It is described by a differential equation:
T'(t) = k(T(t)-Tenv)
Solving (brush up on your diff eqs http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/Linear.aspx" ):
T(t)=Tenv+\DeltaT*ek*t

To solve the above:
Tenv = 30o; \DeltaT = -20o
T(0)=10o
T(1hr)=15o=30o + (-20o)ek(1)
3/4 = ek
ln .75 = k
k = -.288

And the second part, plugging in k:
Tenv = 0o; \DeltaT = 20o
T(0) = 20o
T(t) = 0o + 20oe-.288t
T(1) = 20oe-.288(1) = 15o

If you can understand that equation, it should answer all of your questions. In short, direction doesn't matter because there is no privileged frame of reference. Say we were transferring heat between two boxes, one hot, one cold; the rate is not dependent which box we choose as the reference frame (the direction depends on reference frame, but not magnitude)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot, FireStorm!

The equation explains it and it is easy to understand. Great help.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top