Is I=Mk^2 the Same as I=mr^2 in Physics Nomenclature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadPanda6022
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between the equations I = Mk² and I = mr² in physics, both defining the moment of inertia. The key distinction lies in the interpretation of 'r'; in I = Mk², 'k' represents the radius of gyration, while in I = mr², 'r' is typically a directly observable radius. Both equations are equivalent when 'r' is understood in the context of the radius of gyration. However, conventionally, 'r' is reserved for specific geometric contexts, such as a hoop or point mass. Understanding these terms is crucial for accurate application in physics.
SadPanda6022
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, quick question.

I got confused in some nomenclature between some books and wanted to clarify somehow. A book I have has I=Mk^2 as defining a radius of gyration. Is this the same as I-mr^2?

Terminology was just confusing me.Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops, I meant I=mr^2.

apologies
 
SadPanda6022 said:
A book I have has I=Mk^2 as defining a radius of gyration. Is this the same as I=mr^2?
It depends what r is supposed to be. Certainly
"I=Mk2, where M is mass, k is the radius of gyration and I is the moment of inertia about the mass centre"
is exactly the same as
"I=mr2, where m is mass, r is the radius of gyration and I is the moment of inertia about the mass centre".
But most writers reserve r to be a directly observable radius, such as the radius of a hoop or of a point mass in a circular orbit.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Closest distance of approach between 2 charged particles
Replies
5
Views
1K
How Do You Calculate the Moment of Inertia for a Disk with a Central Hole?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Two spinning disks, did I mess up?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Confusions about some symbols in QC
Replies
4
Views
1K
Angular Momentum of a Baseball/MasteringPhysics Tech Support
Replies
3
Views
2K
Angular momentum and rotational energy
Replies
2
Views
3K
Motion of rolling metallic shell filled with water
Replies
22
Views
3K
Mechanics: A bowling ball is thrown and rolls with slipping
Replies
8
Views
4K
Why Does Pulley and Spring Setup Result in 2(x1+x2) Displacement?
Replies
8
Views
7K
This 3 mass atwood problem is confusing me
Replies
4
Views
902

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top