Is it better to do a general degree, or a specific degree?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a university student weighing options for their degree, considering a dual concentration, a physics degree, or a math degree. The student expresses uncertainty about their career path, contemplating teaching or working for a polling company, and shows a preference for physics, albeit with reservations about lab components. There is a suggestion that a dual concentration could be beneficial for teaching aspirations, while concerns about the necessity of declaring a major by the end of the year are raised, with some participants advocating for more flexibility in decision-making. Additionally, the conversation touches on the perceived theoretical nature of physics curricula compared to engineering programs, emphasizing the importance of choosing a path that aligns with personal interests and enjoyment.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4
I'm currently in my first year of university, and I have a couple options for my degree. I can:

1) Take a degree where you concentrate in two areas. You concentrate on one a little more than the other, but end up with a broad knowledge of both.

2) Do a degree in physics.

3) Do a degree in some kind of math... general math, statistics, etc.

The problem is, I'm not sure what kind of career I'm looking for yet. I'd kind of like to be a teacher, or maybe someone who works for a polling company.

I'm also not sure if I like physics or math better - I thinkI prefer physics, except for the lab components of the course.

I have to declare a major at the end of this year... aah! Any advice? Is it better to do a degree that concentrates in both areas? I could also major in math/physics and minor in the other.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that you have to decide by the end of this year? Universities should allow students time to decide what they want to do...but I am not sure of your universities policies.
Anyways, if you want to be a teacher, then a concentration in two areas would be a good idea. Not too sure about the qualifications to work at a polling company, you should ask them.

DoubleMint
 
I remember my high school calculus teaching telling us that she became a math major because she didn't want to have to write term papers anymore; she claiming that lab reports were just glorified term papers...

Anyway, I would argue that the lab components of a physics curriculum are but only a small part. One of the complaints of physicists turned engineers is that physics curricula are too theoretical. Once you pass introductory physics (i.e. the physics that everybody takes), you will probably see only one to two lab class a year. Compare that to the engineers who will probably see that many each semester.

I suggest you do what you think you will enjoy the most. It's definitely not an easy decision but one that society makes us choose at such a tender age. Good luck.
 
my friend is 3rd year physics but he isn't interested in physics he wants to become an engineer abroad , he didnt work out in making engineer and i don't know if he is going to do well any advice?
 
doublemint said:
Are you sure that you have to decide by the end of this year? Universities should allow students time to decide what they want to do...but I am not sure of your universities policies.

Depending on what country you're in, the rule may be that you have to declare a major straight out of high school. That rule, at least, goes for most universities here in the Netherlands.
 
"or maybe someone who works for a polling company."

seriously, wtf. . .
 
Back
Top