Is it okay to use dot/cross for free radical rxns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inertia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
AI Thread Summary
Understanding radical reactions and half arrow mechanisms can be challenging, but the dot and cross model offers an intuitive approach for visualizing these processes. This model helps clarify the behavior of electrons in radical reactions, making it easier to grasp the concept of one-electron mechanisms. Transitioning from two-electron mechanisms, which utilize full arrows, to one-electron mechanisms for radicals should be manageable with practice. Engaging with the dot and cross model can enhance comprehension without leading to misconceptions, provided that the learner remains aware of the differences in electron movement between the two types of mechanisms.
Inertia
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm learning about various radical reactions, the thing is I'm still getting my head around 'half arrow' mechanisms. However for some reason the dot and cross model for these types of reactions is really intuitive and works great for my understanding. Is this a dangerous path to go down, to work out half arrow mechanisms?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I've not heard of the dot and cross model, can you explain a bit? If you are comfortable with 2-electron mechanisms using arrows, you should be able to easily transition to the 1-electron version for radicals. Maybe you need some practice?
 

Thread 'Solubility of MgSO47H2O in water'

It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
View full post »

Thread 'Why does having 8 valence electrons make an element inert?'

I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
View full post »

Similar threads

Using nitric acid to dissolve brass
Replies
8
Views
3K
Arduino and zero crossing — Non-uniform spikes in interrupt signal
Replies
5
Views
2K
Understanding the free-radical chain reactions
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Runge-Kutta 4 w/ some sugar on the top: How to do error approximation?
2
Replies
65
Views
6K
Need guidance for using and understanding NuShellX
Replies
1
Views
477
Physical details of the operation of galvanic cells
Replies
2
Views
2K
Analytical verification of FEA involving preloaded bolt
Replies
9
Views
2K
Online Courses for Mechanical design
Replies
1
Views
2K
A IR Laser diode focusing and module selection for CSEL Laser pointer
Replies
6
Views
937
My weird geneva mechanism doesn't work. Looking for suggestions
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top